• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肩难产可以预测吗?受孕前和产前因素。

Can shoulder dystocia be predicted? Preconceptive and prenatal factors.

作者信息

Lewis D F, Edwards M S, Asrat T, Adair C D, Brooks G, London S

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University Medical Center, Shreveport 71130, USA.

出版信息

J Reprod Med. 1998 Aug;43(8):654-8.

PMID:9749414
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the predictability of shoulder dystocia using preconceptive and prenatal risk factors.

STUDY DESIGN

Data from 1,622 term patients with prenatal care prior to 20 weeks who delivered single, vertex fetuses during a consecutive 12-month period were analyzed. Two groups were chosen. The first group was patients whose fetuses experienced shoulder dystocia during delivery (cases). The second group (controls) consisted of the remaining patients, whose fetuses had not experienced shoulder dystocia. The two groups were compared with regard to demographics and pregnancy characteristics.

RESULTS

Factors not significantly different between the two groups included were obesity, multiparity, history of diabetes, short maternal stature, postdatism and advanced maternal age. The incidence of macrosomia was significantly higher (P < .001) in cases (35.4%) than in controls (4.8%). Other factors associated with shoulder dystocia were previous shoulder dystocia, concurrent diabetes, prior delivery of a fetus > 4,000 g and excessive weight gain during pregnancy. Many factors previously associated with shoulder dystocia were found to be nonsignificant in our study.

CONCLUSION

Macrosomia appears to be the single important factor associated with shoulder dystocia which, even in the presence of significant risk factors, remains largely unpredictable.

摘要

目的

利用孕前和产前危险因素评估肩难产的可预测性。

研究设计

分析了1622例在妊娠20周前接受产前检查、在连续12个月期间分娩单胎头位胎儿的足月患者的数据。选取了两组。第一组是胎儿在分娩时发生肩难产的患者(病例组)。第二组(对照组)由其余胎儿未发生肩难产的患者组成。比较了两组的人口统计学和妊娠特征。

结果

两组之间无显著差异的因素包括肥胖、多产、糖尿病史、母亲身材矮小、过期妊娠和高龄产妇。病例组巨大儿的发生率(35.4%)显著高于对照组(4.8%)(P <.001)。与肩难产相关的其他因素包括既往肩难产史、并发糖尿病、既往分娩胎儿体重>4000g以及孕期体重过度增加。在我们的研究中,许多先前与肩难产相关的因素被发现无统计学意义。

结论

巨大儿似乎是与肩难产相关的唯一重要因素,即使存在显著的危险因素,肩难产在很大程度上仍然无法预测。

相似文献

1
Can shoulder dystocia be predicted? Preconceptive and prenatal factors.肩难产可以预测吗?受孕前和产前因素。
J Reprod Med. 1998 Aug;43(8):654-8.
2
Maternal and anthropomorphic risk factors for shoulder dystocia.肩难产的母体及人体测量学风险因素。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(5):567-70. doi: 10.1080/00016340600605044.
3
Macrosomia is the only reliable predictor of shoulder dystocia in babies weighing 3.5 kg or more.巨大儿是体重 3.5 公斤或以上婴儿发生肩难产的唯一可靠预测指标。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 Mar;149(1):44-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.12.003. Epub 2009 Dec 29.
4
Shoulder dystocia: nursing prevention and posttrauma care.肩难产:护理预防与创伤后护理
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2008 Jan-Mar;22(1):14-20. doi: 10.1097/01.JPN.0000311870.07958.81.
5
Risk factors for shoulder dystocia.肩难产的危险因素。
Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Dec;66(6):762-8.
6
Shoulder dystocia: a comparison of patients with and without diabetes mellitus.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006 Jan;273(4):203-6. doi: 10.1007/s00404-005-0051-9. Epub 2005 Oct 20.
7
Fetal macrosomia in African women: a study of 249 cases.非洲女性的巨大胎儿:一项对249例病例的研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009 Jun;279(6):857-61. doi: 10.1007/s00404-008-0780-7. Epub 2008 Nov 19.
8
Shoulder dystocia. A complication of fetal macrosomia and prolonged second stage of labor with midpelvic delivery.肩难产。胎儿巨大及第二产程延长伴中骨盆分娩的一种并发症。
Obstet Gynecol. 1978 Nov;52(5):526-9.
9
What factors are associated with neonatal injury following shoulder dystocia?肩难产之后,哪些因素与新生儿损伤相关?
J Perinatol. 2006 Feb;26(2):85-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211441.
10
Shoulder dystocia: are historic risk factors reliable predictors?肩难产:历史风险因素是可靠的预测指标吗?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jun;192(6):1933-5; discussion 1935-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.054.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk of macrosomia remains glucose-dependent in a cohort of women with pregestational type 1 diabetes and good glycemic control.在孕前1型糖尿病且血糖控制良好的一组女性中,巨大儿风险仍然依赖于血糖水平。
Endocrine. 2017 Feb;55(2):447-455. doi: 10.1007/s12020-016-1134-z. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
2
Shoulder Dystocia.肩难产
Med J Armed Forces India. 2003 Jan;59(1):75-6. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(03)80118-1. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
3
SHOULDER DYSTOCIA : OBSTETRICIAN'S NIGHTMARE.肩难产:产科医生的噩梦。
Med J Armed Forces India. 2002 Apr;58(2):111-3. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(02)80040-5. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
4
Shoulder dystocia: prediction and management.肩难产:预测与处理
Womens Health (Lond). 2016;12(2):251-61. doi: 10.2217/whe.15.103. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
5
A comparison of obstetric maneuvers for the acute management of shoulder dystocia.肩难产的急性处理中产科手法的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jun;117(6):1272-1278. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821a12c9.
6
Birth size distribution in 3,705 infants born to mothers with type 1 diabetes: a population-based study.3,705 例 1 型糖尿病母亲所生婴儿的出生体重分布:一项基于人群的研究。
Diabetes Care. 2011 May;34(5):1145-9. doi: 10.2337/dc10-2406. Epub 2011 Mar 23.