• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Methodological advances and plans for improving regulatory success for confirmatory studies.

作者信息

Koch G G, Davis S M, Anderson R L

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.

出版信息

Stat Med. 1998;17(15-16):1675-90. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980815/30)17:15/16<1675::aid-sim970>3.0.co;2-c.

DOI:10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980815/30)17:15/16<1675::aid-sim970>3.0.co;2-c
PMID:9749439
Abstract

Regulatory success for new medical products requires convincing statistical results from planned analyses for relevant and reliable data from well-designed clinical studies. Statistical methodology has a critical role for such success through strengthening the robustness of study findings to sources of bias, variability and spurious events. Areas of particular importance for statistical methodology include the structure for study design, the schedule and procedures for data collection, and plans for primary data analyses. This paper discusses some challenging statistical issues for these areas and suggests potential strategies for addressing them. The objective of these strategies as well as other methodological advances is the minimization of ambiguity in the findings of confirmatory studies. In this way, their effective use can enhance regulatory success.

摘要

相似文献

1
Methodological advances and plans for improving regulatory success for confirmatory studies.
Stat Med. 1998;17(15-16):1675-90. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980815/30)17:15/16<1675::aid-sim970>3.0.co;2-c.
2
The management of interim analyses in drug development.药物研发中的期中分析管理。
Stat Med. 1998;17(15-16):1801-9; discussion 1811-2. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980815/30)17:15/16<1801::aid-sim981>3.0.co;2-l.
3
Seeking harmony: estimands and sensitivity analyses for confirmatory clinical trials.寻求一致性:确证性临床试验的估计量与敏感性分析
Clin Trials. 2016 Aug;13(4):456-8. doi: 10.1177/1740774516633115. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
4
Regulatory perspectives on data safety monitoring boards: protecting the integrity of data.数据安全监测委员会的监管视角:保护数据的完整性
Drug Saf. 2004;27(1):1-6. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200427010-00001.
5
Comments on the draft guidance on "adaptive design clinical trials for drugs and biologics" of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.对美国食品药品监督管理局《药物和生物制品适应性设计临床试验指南》草案的评论
J Biopharm Stat. 2010 Nov;20(6):1125-31. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2010.514453.
6
[Methodological recommendations of the Regulatory Agencies].[监管机构的方法学建议]
Med Clin (Barc). 2005 Dec 1;125 Suppl 1:72-6. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7753(05)72213-2.
7
Two-tailed tests and a statistical significance at 0.05: what do they mean?双侧检验与0.05的统计显著性:它们是什么意思?
Midwifery. 2004 Jun;20(2):142-3. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2004.03.005.
8
Randomized clinical trials in medical rehabilitation research.医学康复研究中的随机临床试验。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Sep-Oct;78(5):486-99. doi: 10.1097/00002060-199909000-00016.
9
Reliability and validity in research.研究中的信度与效度。
Nurs Stand. 2006;20(44):41-5. doi: 10.7748/ns2006.07.20.44.41.c6560.
10
Methodological considerations with secondary analyses.二次分析的方法学考量
Outcomes Manag Nurs Pract. 1999 Oct-Dec;3(4):147-52.