Newman-Tancredi A, Nicolas J P, Audinot V, Gavaudan S, Verrièle L, Touzard M, Chaput C, Richard N, Millan M J
Department of Psychopharmacology, Institut de Recherches Servier, Croissy-sur-Seine (Paris), France.
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1998 Aug;358(2):197-206. doi: 10.1007/pl00005243.
This study examined the activity of chemically diverse alpha2 adrenoceptor ligands at recombinant human (h) and native rat (r) alpha2A adrenoceptors compared with 5-HT1A receptors. First, in competition binding experiments at h alpha2A and h5-HT1A receptors expressed in CHO cells, several compounds, including the antagonists 1-(2-pyrimidinyl)piperazine (1-PP), (+/-)-idazoxan, benalfocin (SKF 86466), yohimbine and RX 821,002, displayed preference for h alpha2A versus h5-HT1A receptors of only 1.4-, 3.6-, 4-, 10- and 11-fold, respectively (based on differences in pKi values). Clonidine, brimonidine (UK 14304), the benzopyrrolidine fluparoxan and the guanidines guanfacine and guanabenz exhibited intermediate selectivity (22- to 31-fold) for h alpha2A receptors. Only the antagonist atipamezole and the agonist dexmedetomidine (DMT) displayed high preference for alpha2 adrenoceptors (1290- and 91-fold, respectively). Second, the compounds were tested for their ability to induce h5-HT1A receptor-mediated G-protein activation, as indicated by the stimulation of [35S]GTPgammaS binding. All except atipamezole and RX 821,002 exhibited agonist activity, with potencies which correlated with their affinity for h5-HT1A receptors. Relative efficacies (Emax values) were 25-35% for guanabenz, guanfacine, WB 4101 and benalfocin, 50-65% for 1-PP, (+/-)-idazoxan and clonidine, and over 70% for fluparoxan, oxymetazoline and yohimbine (relative to 5-HT = 100%). Yohimbine-induced [35S]GTPgammaS binding was inhibited by the selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY 100,635. In contrast, RX 821,002 was the only ligand which exhibited antagonist activity at h5-HT1A receptors, inhibiting 5-HT-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding. Atipamezole, which exhibited negligeable affinity for 5-HT1A receptors, was inactive. Third, the affinities for r alpha2A differed considerably from the affinities for h alpha2A receptors whereas the affinities for r5-HT1A differed much less from the affinities for h5-HT1A receptors. This affected markedly the affinity ratios of certain compounds. For example, (+/-)-idazoxan was only 3.6-fold selective for h alpha2A versus h5-HT1A but 51-fold selective for r alpha2A versus r5-HT1A receptors. Conversely, yohimbine was tenfold selective for h alpha2A versus h5-HT1A adrenoceptors but 4.2-fold selective for r alpha2A versus r5-HT1A receptors. Nevertheless, both atipamezole and DMT were highly selective for both rat and human alpha2A versus rat or human 5-HT1A receptors. In conclusion, these data indicate that: (1) the agonist DMT and the antagonist atipamezole are the ligands of choice to distinguish alpha2-mediated from 5-HT1A-mediated actions, whilst several of the other compounds show only low or modest selectivity for alpha2A over 5-HT1A receptors; (2) caution should be exercised in experimental and clinical interpretation of the actions of traditionally employed alpha2 ligands, such as clonidine, yohimbine and (+/-)-idazoxan, which exhibit marked agonist activity at 5-HT1A receptors.
本研究检测了化学结构多样的α2肾上腺素能受体配体对重组人(h)和天然大鼠(r)α2A肾上腺素能受体的活性,并与5-HT1A受体进行比较。首先,在CHO细胞中表达的hα2A和h5-HT1A受体的竞争结合实验中,几种化合物,包括拮抗剂1-(2-嘧啶基)哌嗪(1-PP)、(±)-咪唑克生、贝那罗辛(SKF 86466)、育亨宾和RX 821,002,对hα2A受体与h5-HT1A受体的选择性分别仅为1.4倍、3.6倍、4倍、10倍和11倍(基于pKi值的差异)。可乐定、溴莫尼定(UK 14304)、苯并吡咯烷氟哌罗生以及胍法辛和胍那苄对hα2A受体表现出中等选择性(22至31倍)。只有拮抗剂阿替美唑和激动剂右美托咪定(DMT)对α2肾上腺素能受体表现出高度选择性(分别为1290倍和91倍)。其次,检测了这些化合物诱导h5-HT1A受体介导的G蛋白激活的能力,这通过刺激[35S]GTPγS结合来指示。除阿替美唑和RX 821,002外,所有化合物均表现出激动剂活性,其效力与其对h5-HT1A受体的亲和力相关。胍那苄、胍法辛、WB 4101和贝那罗辛的相对效能(Emax值)为25 - 35%,1-PP、(±)-咪唑克生和可乐定为50 - 65%,氟哌罗生、羟甲唑啉和育亨宾超过70%(相对于5-HT = 100%)。育亨宾诱导的[35S]GTPγS结合被选择性5-HT1A受体拮抗剂WAY 100,635抑制。相反,RX 821,002是唯一在h5-HT1A受体上表现出拮抗剂活性的配体,可抑制5-HT刺激的[35S]GTPγS结合。对5-HT1A受体亲和力可忽略不计的阿替美唑无活性。第三,对rα2A的亲和力与对hα2A受体的亲和力有很大差异,而对r5-HT1A的亲和力与对h5-HT1A受体的亲和力差异小得多。这显著影响了某些化合物的亲和力比值。例如,(±)-咪唑克生对hα2A受体与h5-HT1A受体的选择性仅为3.6倍,但对rα2A受体与r5-HT1A受体的选择性为51倍。相反,育亨宾对hα2A受体与h5-HT1A肾上腺素能受体的选择性为10倍,但对rα2A受体与r5-HT1A受体的选择性为4.2倍。然而,阿替美唑和DMT对大鼠和人α2A受体与大鼠或人5-HT1A受体均具有高度选择性。总之,这些数据表明:(1)激动剂DMT和拮抗剂阿替美唑是区分α2介导的作用与5-HT1A介导的作用的首选配体,而其他几种化合物对α2A受体与5-HT1A受体的选择性仅为低或中等;(2)在对传统使用的α2配体(如可乐定、育亨宾和(±)-咪唑克生)的作用进行实验和临床解释时应谨慎,因为它们在5-HT1A受体上表现出明显的激动剂活性。