Kameyama S, Yamazaki S, Kitamura T
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo.
Nihon Rinsho. 1998 Aug;56(8):2114-8.
Since the discovery by Huggins and Hodges that androgen deprivation therapy is effective for prostatic cancer, surgical castration or the administration of exogenous estrogen has been the mainstay of treatment for advanced prostatic cancer. However, surgical castration is refused by some patients because of psychological impact and estrogen therapy is reported to be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The chronic administration of superactive analogue of LHRH has been shown to suppress markedly gonadal steroidogenesis. Medical castration with LHRH analogue has been demonstrated to be safe and effective in patients with advanced prostatic cancer. But the traditional surgical castration still remains as another powerful option, because it is more excellent in the points of compliance and cost-benefit than a monthly injection of expensive LH-RH analogue.
自从哈金斯和霍奇斯发现雄激素剥夺疗法对前列腺癌有效以来,手术去势或给予外源性雌激素一直是晚期前列腺癌治疗的主要方法。然而,一些患者因心理影响而拒绝手术去势,并且据报道雌激素疗法与显著的发病率和死亡率相关。长期给予促黄体生成素释放激素(LHRH)的超活性类似物已被证明可显著抑制性腺类固醇生成。已证明用LHRH类似物进行药物去势对晚期前列腺癌患者是安全有效的。但传统的手术去势仍然是另一种有力选择,因为在依从性和成本效益方面,它比每月注射昂贵的LH-RH类似物更具优势。