• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[-带套囊口咽气道(COPA)的临床应用-]

[-The clinical use of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA)-].

作者信息

Boufflers E, Maslowski D, Menu H, Guermouche T, Theeten G, Beague D, Reyford H, Krivosic-Horber R

机构信息

Département d'anesthésie-réanimation chirurgicale 1, CHRU, Lille, France.

出版信息

Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1998;17(3):206-9. doi: 10.1016/s0750-7658(98)80001-4.

DOI:10.1016/s0750-7658(98)80001-4
PMID:9750731
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the performance of the COPA device during general anaesthesia.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, clinical, open study.

PATIENTS

Eighty patients scheduled for short elective surgical procedures under general anaesthesia not requiring tracheal intubation.

METHOD

After premedication (midazolam, atropine), anaesthesia was induced with propofol (154 +/- 40 mg = 2.47 +/- 0.8 mg.kg-1) and alfentanil (1.14 +/- 0.43 mg). The COPA device was inserted in a fashion similar to a Guedel airway device. The device was evaluated on the following criteria: correct choice of COPA size, ease of insertion, ability to obtain or maintain patent airway. Adverse reactions were noted, such as coughing, nausea, regurgitation, inhalation, and sore throat. The overall rating of the COPA as a "hand free device" was evaluated on the basis of excellent, good, fair, and poor.

RESULTS

Insertion of the device was easy and in 70 cases successful on the first attempt. Jaw thrust on head tilt was necessary in half the cases. No patient necessitated intubation because of hypoxaemia or airway obstruction. Adverse reactions occurred in few cases and consisted of sore throat (always moderate) in 10% of the cases. COPA was evaluated as excellent or good in 80% of the cases.

CONCLUSION

COPA is a convenient device for airway management in fasting patients undergoing general anaesthesia for elective surgery in the supine position, in whom tracheal intubation is not indicated.

摘要

目的

评估COPA装置在全身麻醉期间的性能。

研究设计

前瞻性、临床、开放性研究。

患者

80例计划在全身麻醉下进行无需气管插管的短期择期手术的患者。

方法

在给予术前用药(咪达唑仑、阿托品)后,用丙泊酚(154±40mg = 2.47±0.8mg·kg-1)和阿芬太尼(1.14±0.43mg)诱导麻醉。以类似于Guedel气道装置的方式插入COPA装置。根据以下标准对该装置进行评估:COPA尺寸的正确选择、插入的难易程度、获得或维持气道通畅的能力。记录不良反应,如咳嗽、恶心、反流、吸入和咽痛。根据优、良、中、差对COPA作为“免手操作装置”进行总体评分。

结果

该装置插入容易,70例首次尝试成功。半数病例需要在头部后仰时进行下颌前推。没有患者因低氧血症或气道阻塞而需要插管。少数病例出现不良反应,10%的病例出现咽痛(均为中度)。80%的病例中COPA被评为优或良。

结论

对于仰卧位接受择期手术全身麻醉的禁食患者,在无需气管插管的情况下,COPA是一种方便的气道管理装置。

相似文献

1
[-The clinical use of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA)-].[-带套囊口咽气道(COPA)的临床应用-]
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1998;17(3):206-9. doi: 10.1016/s0750-7658(98)80001-4.
2
A comparison of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA) with the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) during manually controlled positive pressure ventilation.在手动控制正压通气期间,对带套囊口咽气道(COPA)与喉罩气道(LMA)进行比较。
J Clin Anesth. 1999 Nov;11(7):590-5. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(99)00102-6.
3
Insertion of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA) with propofol or sevoflurane in adults.
J Clin Anesth. 1999 Jun;11(4):280-4. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(99)00037-9.
4
A randomized controlled trial comparing the cuffed oropharyngeal airway and the laryngeal mask airway in spontaneously breathing anesthetized adults.一项比较带套囊口咽气道与喉罩气道在自主呼吸麻醉成年患者中应用效果的随机对照试验。
Anesthesiology. 1998 Apr;88(4):970-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199804000-00017.
5
Airway management in spontaneously breathing anaesthetized children: comparison of the Laryngeal Mask Airway with the cuffed oropharyngeal airway.自主呼吸麻醉儿童的气道管理:喉罩气道与带套囊口咽气道的比较。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2002 Jun;12(5):411-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.00877.x.
6
The use of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway in paediatric patients.带套囊口咽气道在儿科患者中的应用。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2002 Jan;12(1):43-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.00760.x.
7
Use of cuffed oropharyngeal vs laryngeal mask airway in elderly patients.老年患者中带套囊口咽通气道与喉罩气道的应用比较
Can J Anaesth. 1999 Apr;46(4):363-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03013229.
8
Sore throat following three adult supraglottic airway devices: A randomised controlled trial.三种成人声门上气道装置使用后咽痛的随机对照试验。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017 Jul;34(7):417-424. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000539.
9
Cuffed oropharyngeal airway in the patients undergoing short surgical procedures.
J Med Assoc Thai. 2002 Sep;85 Suppl 3:S1017-23.
10
The pressor response after laryngeal mask or cuffed oropharyngeal airway insertion.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1999 Nov;43(10):1053-6. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.1999.431014.x.