Harvey S R, Girotra R N, Nemoto T, Ciani F, Chu T M
Cancer Res. 1976 Sep;36(9 PT 2):3486-94.
Analysis of carcinoembryonic antigen (CE)-reactive glycoproteins from liver metastasis of primary colon and breast tumors and from primary breast tumors has been carried out by affinity chromatography on concanavalin A (Con A)-Sepharose. Three CEA-reactive glycoproteins from colon tumors (liver metastasis) with different binding capacity to Con A have been separated and further purified by gel filtration. Of the 3 CEA-reactive glycoproteins, 1 of them did not bind to Con A. Both Con A-binding and nonbinding CEA-reactive glycoproteins were immunologically indistinguishable when tested with a reference goat anti-CEA (ACE, 67-70; Dr. C.W. Todd and Dr. M.L. Egan), as well as with a variety of rabbit anti-CEA and anti-CEA (nonbinding) prepared in this laboratory. Carbohydrate analysis showed that mannose content of different purified CEA preparations or nonbinding CEA did not differ appreciably. N-Acetylglucosamine content of purified CEA preparations, however, varied considerably, suggesting that this sugar may impart the specificity of binding of CEA to Con A. The purified CEA preparations differed in their ability to inhibit the binding of 125l-labeled CEA to goat anti-CEA. One of the purified CEA preparations had 3- to 8-fold greater inhibitory capacity when compared to other preparations and shared a partial identity with a glycoprotein present in the extracts of fetal colon. The glycoprotein extracts of primary breast tumors did not contain a CEA that was immunologically identical to CEA present in colon tumors, whereas the liver metastasis of primary breast tumors showed several CEA-reactive glycoproteins as judged by radioimmunoassay. However, these CEA-reactive glycoproteins did not have any antigenic relationship with CEA from colon tumors when tested by double diffusion and immunoelectrophoresis. In conclusion, when Con A affinity chromatography of tumor glycoproteins is carried out under defined conditions and with the use of appropriate antisera, it is possible to delineate the presence or absence of CEA in tumors of nonentodermal origin.
采用伴刀豆球蛋白A(Con A)-琼脂糖亲和层析法,对原发性结肠癌和乳腺癌肝转移灶以及原发性乳腺癌中的癌胚抗原(CE)反应性糖蛋白进行了分析。从结肠癌肿瘤(肝转移灶)中分离出了三种与Con A结合能力不同的CE反应性糖蛋白,并通过凝胶过滤进一步纯化。在这3种CE反应性糖蛋白中,有1种不与Con A结合。用参考山羊抗CEA(ACE,67 - 70;C.W. 托德博士和M.L. 伊根博士)以及本实验室制备的多种兔抗CEA和抗CEA(非结合型)进行检测时,与Con A结合和不结合的CE反应性糖蛋白在免疫方面无法区分。碳水化合物分析表明,不同纯化的CE制剂或非结合型CE的甘露糖含量没有明显差异。然而,纯化的CE制剂中N - 乙酰葡糖胺含量差异很大,这表明这种糖可能赋予了CE与Con A结合的特异性。纯化的CE制剂在抑制125I标记的CE与山羊抗CEA结合的能力上有所不同。其中一种纯化的CE制剂与其他制剂相比,具有3至8倍更强的抑制能力,并且与胎儿结肠提取物中存在的一种糖蛋白有部分相同之处。原发性乳腺癌的糖蛋白提取物中不含与结肠癌中存在的CE在免疫上相同的CE,而原发性乳腺癌的肝转移灶通过放射免疫测定显示有几种CE反应性糖蛋白。然而,通过双向扩散和免疫电泳检测时,这些CE反应性糖蛋白与结肠癌的CE没有任何抗原关系。总之,当在规定条件下并使用适当的抗血清对肿瘤糖蛋白进行Con A亲和层析时,有可能确定非内胚层来源肿瘤中CE的存在与否。