Van Doorne H, Van Kampen B J, Van der Lee R W, Rummenie L, Van der Veen A J, De Vries W J
Dept. of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 1998 Jul-Aug;52(4):159-64.
Sterility testing and media fills are essential requirements in the pharmaceutical industry. With the results obtained the manufacturer must ensure that the aseptic filling process is under control. In an eight year (1988-1995) retrospective survey of three major Dutch pharmaceutical companies the performance of the sterility test, of media fills and their relationship have been statistically evaluated. The products included human and veterinary pharmaceuticals and biologicals, and were divided into six different groups according to their production process and primary containers. A distinction was made between the results from the period 1985-1991 and the period 1992-1995, because this made the statistical analyses of a number of types of products possible, and because some significant changes in the production process were made in 1991 at some of the production sites. The results of the evaluation of the sterility test show that the frequency of false positives has not changed significantly. The overall rate of false positives of 0.17% is a factor ten better than considered acceptable by USP XXIII. For all product groups the frequency of positive sterility tests has decreased during the period of investigation. During the period 1992-1995 there was no significant difference between the results of product sterility tests and the negative controls for any of the product groups. This indicates that given the present state-of-the-art production the sterility test offers little or no additional security. The overall contamination of the media fills done in the more recent period is a factor twenty better than the limit given in the PDA Technical Monograph No. 2. In the more recent period there is a good agreement between the observed positive rate of the sterility tests and the positive rate that had been estimated from the results of the media fills. This indicates that despite some shortcomings, media fills are an adequate simulation of the production process and can be used to give an estimate of the rejection rate for the various product groups. The overall conclusion is that the production conditions of the participating Dutch pharmaceutical companies comply with the current international guidelines for aseptic production and sterility testing.
无菌检测和培养基灌装是制药行业的基本要求。根据所获得的结果,制造商必须确保无菌灌装过程处于受控状态。在对荷兰三家主要制药公司进行的为期八年(1988 - 1995年)的回顾性调查中,对无菌检测、培养基灌装的性能及其关系进行了统计评估。产品包括人用和兽用药品及生物制品,并根据其生产工艺和初级包装容器分为六个不同的组。对1985 - 1991年期间和1992 - 1995年期间的结果进行了区分,因为这样可以对一些类型的产品进行统计分析,并且因为一些生产场所在1991年对生产工艺进行了一些重大改变。无菌检测的评估结果表明,假阳性频率没有显著变化。0.17%的总体假阳性率比美国药典XXIII认为可接受的水平好十倍。在调查期间,所有产品组的无菌检测阳性频率都有所下降。在1992 - 1995年期间,任何产品组的产品无菌检测结果与阴性对照之间均无显著差异。这表明,鉴于目前的生产技术水平,无菌检测几乎没有提供额外的安全性。近期进行的培养基灌装的总体污染情况比PDA技术专著第2号中规定的限值好二十倍。近期,无菌检测的观察阳性率与根据培养基灌装结果估计的阳性率之间有很好的一致性。这表明,尽管存在一些缺点,但培养基灌装是生产过程的充分模拟,可用于估计各个产品组的拒收率。总体结论是,参与调查的荷兰制药公司的生产条件符合当前无菌生产和无菌检测的国际指南。