Suppr超能文献

估计结直肠癌筛查中的敏感度和停留时间:统计方法的比较

Estimating sensitivity and sojourn time in screening for colorectal cancer: a comparison of statistical approaches.

作者信息

Prevost T C, Launoy G, Duffy S W, Chen H H

机构信息

Institute of Public Health, University Forvie Site, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Sep 15;148(6):609-19. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009687.

Abstract

The effectiveness of cancer screening depends crucially on two elements: the sojourn time (that is, the duration of the preclinical screen-detectable period) and the sensitivity of the screening test. Previous literature on methods of estimating mean sojourn time and sensitivity has largely concentrated on breast cancer screening. Screening for colorectal cancer has been shown to be effective in randomized trials, but there is little literature on the estimation of sojourn time and sensitivity. It would be interesting to demonstrate whether methods commonly used in breast cancer screening could be used in colorectal cancer screening. In this paper, the authors consider various analytic strategies for fitting exponential models to data from a screening program for colorectal cancer conducted in Calvados, France, between 1991 and 1994. The models yielded estimates of mean sojourn time of approximately 2 years for 45- to 54-year-olds, 3 years for 55- to 64-year-olds, and 6 years for 65- to 74-year-olds. Estimates of sensitivity were approximately 75%, 50%, and 40% for persons aged 45-54, 55-64, and 65-74 years, respectively. There is room for improvement in all models in terms of goodness of fit, particularly for the first year after screening, but results from randomized trials indicate that the sensitivity estimates are roughly correct.

摘要

癌症筛查的有效性主要取决于两个因素

停留时间(即临床前可筛查检测期的持续时间)和筛查测试的敏感性。以往关于估计平均停留时间和敏感性方法的文献主要集中在乳腺癌筛查方面。在随机试验中,结直肠癌筛查已被证明是有效的,但关于停留时间和敏感性估计的文献却很少。证明乳腺癌筛查中常用的方法是否可用于结直肠癌筛查将会很有意思。在本文中,作者考虑了各种分析策略,以便将指数模型拟合到1991年至1994年在法国卡尔瓦多斯进行的一项结直肠癌筛查项目的数据中。这些模型得出的结果显示,45至54岁人群的平均停留时间估计约为2年,55至64岁人群为3年,65至74岁人群为6年。45至54岁、55至64岁和65至74岁人群的敏感性估计分别约为75%、50%和40%。就拟合优度而言,所有模型都有改进的空间,尤其是在筛查后的第一年,但随机试验的结果表明敏感性估计大致正确。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验