Suppr超能文献

[心房扑动的导管消融。后间隔峡部阻滞的电生理特征]

[Catheter ablation of atrial flutter. Electrophysiological characterization of posterior and septal isthmus block].

作者信息

Moreira J M, Alessi S R, Rezende A G, Prudêncio L A, de Paola A A

机构信息

Escola Paulista de Medicina-UNIFESP.

出版信息

Arq Bras Cardiol. 1998 Jul;71(1):37-47. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x1998000700008.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Evaluate the different types of conduction blocks obtained between inferior vena cava-tricuspid annulus (posterior isthmus) and between tricuspid annulus-coronary sinus ostium (septal isthmus) after radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of atrial flutter (AFL).

METHODS

In 16 procedures, 14 patients (pts), 9 male, with type I AFL underwent RF ablation. Atrial activation around tricuspid annulus was performed with a 10-bipole "Halo" catheter (H1-2; H19-20). In sinus rhythm, isthmus conduction was evaluated during proximal coronary sinus (PCS) and low lateral right atrium (H1-2) pacing, before and after linear ablation. According to the wave front of impulse propagation we assessed absence of block (bidirectional conduction); incomplete block (bidirectional conduction with delay in one front of impulse propagation) and complete block (absence of conduction). The PCS/H1-2 interval was measured before and after ablation.

RESULTS

Complete isthmus block was achieved in 7 (44%) and incomplete block in 4 (25%) procedures. Conduction block was not achieved in 5 procedures. At a mean follow-up of 12 months, there were no recurrences in the pts with complete block, whereas AFL recurred in the 6 pts with incomplete or no conduction block (p < 0.001). Pts with complete block had delta PCS/H1-2 interval (74.0 +/- 26.0 ms) greater than incomplete (30.5 +/- 7.5 ms) or absent block (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The verification of complete isthmus conduction block with atrial multipolar mapping is an effective strategy to assess electrophysiological success and absence of late recurrence in common atrial flutter ablation.

摘要

目的

评估在心房扑动(AFL)的射频(RF)导管消融术后,在下腔静脉-三尖瓣环(后峡部)之间以及三尖瓣环-冠状窦口(间隔峡部)之间获得的不同类型的传导阻滞。

方法

在16例手术中,14例患者(9例男性)接受了I型AFL的RF消融。使用10极“光环”导管(H1-2;H19-20)进行三尖瓣环周围的心房激动标测。在窦性心律下,在近端冠状窦(PCS)和右房低侧壁(H1-2)起搏期间,在直线消融前后评估峡部传导。根据冲动传播的波前,我们评估了阻滞的缺失(双向传导);不完全阻滞(双向传导,但在冲动传播的一个波前有延迟)和完全阻滞(无传导)。在消融前后测量PCS/H1-2间期。

结果

7例(44%)手术实现了峡部完全阻滞,4例(25%)手术实现了不完全阻滞。5例手术未实现传导阻滞。平均随访12个月时,完全阻滞的患者无复发,而6例不完全或无传导阻滞的患者出现了AFL复发(p<0.001)。完全阻滞的患者的PCS/H1-2间期差值(74.0±26.0毫秒)大于不完全阻滞(30.5±7.5毫秒)或无阻滞的患者(p<0.05)。

结论

用心房多极标测验证峡部完全传导阻滞是评估常见心房扑动消融的电生理成功及晚期复发缺失的有效策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验