[Spiral CT and conventional CT in the preoperative imaging of intraocular metal foreign bodies].

PURPOSE

To compare the effectiveness of spiral CT versus conventional CT in the preoperative assessment of metallic intraocular foreign bodies.

METHODS

Eighteen patients with penetrating eye injuries and suspected metallic intraocular foreign bodies were assigned to undergo either spiral CT or conventional CT in the axial plane. The spiral and the conventional CT data were transferred to a workstation, and reconstructions in the coronal and sagittal planes were performed. Additional direct coronal scanning was performed only when necessary for preoperative assessment. The quality of the axial as well as the reconstructed coronal and sagittal images was assessed for each imaging modality. The size of the foreign bodies was measured and compared to the actual diameter. Total examination time and radiation dose delivered to the lens were measured for each imaging modality.

RESULTS

All foreign bodies were detected by each scanning modality on the axial and on the reconstructed planes. The quality of the axial images was similar for spiral and conventional CT. The spiral technique provided high-quality reconstructed images which allowed accurate localization of the foreign bodies in all cases. Reconstructions by conventional technique were inadequate for preoperative assessment. The examination time for the total orbital volume was 18 s for spiral CT and 52 s for conventional CT. Radiation dose delivered to the lens was 35 mGy for spiral CT and 56 mGy for conventional CT axial scanning.

CONCLUSION

Spiral CT multiplanar imaging offers several significant advantages for the preoperative assessment of metallic intraocular foreign bodies compared to the conventional CT technique in clinical practice, including short examination time, minimized motion artifacts, reduced radiation exposure, and accurate localization.