Osborn J W
Department of Oral Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
J Dent Res. 1998 Sep;77(9):1730-8. doi: 10.1177/00220345980770090901.
The temporal and spatial patterns in which teeth are initiated in the growing jaws of embryos are constant for a species but different for different species. The sources of the patterns have been explained in two ways. First, they are the outcome of reactions between molecules created at stationary targets and those which diffuse through embryonic tissues (e.g., Edmund, 1960). Second, Osborn (1978) supposed that the patterns mirror the way a (mixed) population of parent cells, the tooth clone, grows. Westergaard and Ferguson (1986, 1987, 1990) concluded, from their observations of the sequence of tooth initiation in alligators, that the complicated sequences in which 20 teeth are initiated in each tooth quadrant could not be explained by jaw growth. The present study attempts to refute this criticism by means of measurements made from the raw data published by Westergaard and Ferguson. These data reveal that new teeth, here called primary teeth, are added at a constant rate at the back of the jaw. Interstitial growth of the cells between primary teeth creates space for secondary teeth in secondary regions. The secondary regions increase in length exponentially with time. The sequence in which teeth are initiated in the growing secondary regions was found to be the same in every part of the upper and lower jaws. It was accurately reproduced by a computer program based on a linear contraction rate of inhibitory zones and exponential growth of secondary regions. The results suggest that the posterior progress zone in alligator embryos grows about 125 microm a day. Newly initiated tooth germs are surrounded by an inhibitory zone about 250 microm in diameter. These zones contract from 20 to 30 microm a day until they are about 170 microm in diameter. The sequences in which tooth positions are initiated in embryos may be more the result of the pattern in which cells escape from molecules that inhibit induction rather than the pattern in which cells create molecules that initiate induction.
在胚胎不断生长的颌骨中,牙齿萌出的时空模式对于一个物种来说是恒定的,但不同物种之间则有所不同。对于这些模式的成因,有两种解释。其一,它们是在固定靶点产生的分子与那些在胚胎组织中扩散的分子之间反应的结果(例如,埃德蒙,1960年)。其二,奥斯本(1978年)认为这些模式反映了亲代细胞群体(牙齿克隆)的生长方式。韦斯特加德和弗格森(1986年、1987年、1990年)通过观察短吻鳄牙齿萌出的顺序得出结论,即每个牙象限中20颗牙齿萌出的复杂顺序无法用颌骨生长来解释。本研究试图通过对韦斯特加德和弗格森发表的原始数据进行测量来反驳这一批评。这些数据表明,新的牙齿(这里称为乳牙)以恒定速率在颌骨后部添加。乳牙之间细胞的间隙生长为次级区域的恒牙创造了空间。次级区域的长度随时间呈指数增长。发现在上下颌的每个部位,恒牙在不断生长的次级区域萌出的顺序都是相同的。基于抑制区的线性收缩率和次级区域的指数生长的计算机程序准确地再现了这一顺序。结果表明,短吻鳄胚胎中的后部进展区每天生长约125微米。新萌出的牙胚被一个直径约250微米的抑制区包围。这些区域每天从20微米收缩到30微米,直到直径约为170微米。胚胎中牙齿萌出位置的顺序可能更多是细胞从抑制诱导的分子中逃脱的模式的结果,而不是细胞产生启动诱导的分子的模式的结果。