Cifkova R, Peleska J, Hradec J, Rosolová H, Pintérová E, Zeman K, Oddou-Stock P, Thirlwell J, Botteri F
Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
J Hum Hypertens. 1998 Aug;12(8):563-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1000615.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of valsartan, a new angiotensin II receptor antagonist, versus atenolol in the treatment of severe primary hypertension. A total of 103 adult out-patients were randomised to receive either valsartan 160 mg or atenolol 100 mg once daily for 6 weeks. If necessary, additional blood pressure (BP) control could be provided as add-on therapy. Both valsartan and atenolol decreased mean sitting diastolic BP (DBP) and mean sitting systolic BP (SBP): least squares mean change from baseline in DBP; valsartan, -20.0 mm Hg; atenolol, -20.4 mm Hg: in SBP; valsartan, -30.0 mm Hg; atenolol, -25.5 mm Hg. There was no statistically significant difference between the treatment groups. Add-on hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg was required by 97.2% of patients receiving atenolol and 83.6% of patients receiving valsartan; additional verapamil SR 240 mg was also required by 58.3% of patients receiving atenolol and 64.2% receiving valsartan. Valsartan was well tolerated, with a comparable incidence of treatment-related adverse experiences in both groups. In conclusion valsartan 160 mg is as well tolerated and effective as atenolol 100 mg in lowering BP in severely hypertensive patients.
本研究旨在评估新型血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂缬沙坦与阿替洛尔治疗重度原发性高血压的疗效和耐受性。总共103名成年门诊患者被随机分为两组,分别每日一次服用160毫克缬沙坦或100毫克阿替洛尔,为期6周。如有必要,可提供额外的血压控制作为附加治疗。缬沙坦和阿替洛尔均降低了平均静息舒张压(DBP)和平均静息收缩压(SBP):DBP自基线的最小二乘均值变化;缬沙坦为-20.0毫米汞柱;阿替洛尔为-20.4毫米汞柱;SBP方面,缬沙坦为-30.0毫米汞柱;阿替洛尔为-25.5毫米汞柱。治疗组之间无统计学显著差异。接受阿替洛尔的患者中有97.2%以及接受缬沙坦的患者中有83.6%需要加用25毫克氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ);接受阿替洛尔的患者中有58.3%以及接受缬沙坦的患者中有64.2%还需要加用240毫克缓释维拉帕米。缬沙坦耐受性良好,两组治疗相关不良事件的发生率相当。总之,在降低重度高血压患者血压方面,160毫克缬沙坦与100毫克阿替洛尔的耐受性和疗效相当。