• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韦氏成人智力量表修订版图片排列分测验中项目难度顺序:来自脑外伤样本的数据

Order of item difficulty on the WAIS-R picture arrangement subtest: data from a traumatically brain-injured sample.

作者信息

Heath J A, Leathem J M

机构信息

Rehabilitation Centre, Palmerston North Hospital, MidCentral Health, New Zealand.

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 1998 Aug;87(1):243-50. doi: 10.2466/pms.1998.87.1.243.

DOI:10.2466/pms.1998.87.1.243
PMID:9760652
Abstract

Although the items within the WAIS-R subtests are presumed to be in ascending order of difficulty, several studies have indicated that the Picture Arrangement subtest items are out of order for clinical groups. The present study retrospectively examined item difficulty and discrimination in the test data of 74 individuals who had been referred for neuropsychological assessment following a traumatic brain injury. While results were not statistically significant, qualitative analysis of partial credit scoring for four of the items indicated some inconsistencies in the scoring rationale. Caution is recommended in the use and interpretation of the Picture Arrangement tests scores in the assessment of individuals with traumatic brain injury.

摘要

尽管韦氏成人智力量表修订版(WAIS-R)各分测验中的题目被认为是按照难度升序排列的,但多项研究表明,对于临床群体而言,图片排列分测验的题目顺序并不正确。本研究回顾性分析了74名因创伤性脑损伤而接受神经心理学评估者的测验数据中的题目难度和区分度。虽然结果无统计学意义,但对其中4个题目的部分计分进行的定性分析表明,计分原理存在一些不一致之处。在对创伤性脑损伤患者进行评估时,建议谨慎使用和解释图片排列测验的分数。

相似文献

1
Order of item difficulty on the WAIS-R picture arrangement subtest: data from a traumatically brain-injured sample.韦氏成人智力量表修订版图片排列分测验中项目难度顺序:来自脑外伤样本的数据
Percept Mot Skills. 1998 Aug;87(1):243-50. doi: 10.2466/pms.1998.87.1.243.
2
Order of item difficulty on picture arrangement: extending the discussion to the WAIS-III.图片排列中项目难度的顺序:将讨论扩展到韦氏成人智力量表第三版。
Percept Mot Skills. 1999 Jun;88(3 Pt 1):1053-6. doi: 10.2466/pms.1999.88.3.1053.
3
Clinical utility of demographically corrected WAIS-III subtest scores after traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后经人口统计学校正的韦氏成人智力量表第三版(WAIS-III)分测验分数的临床效用
Clin Neuropsychol. 2009 Apr;23(3):373-84. doi: 10.1080/13854040802279691. Epub 2008 Aug 1.
4
WAIS-R item difficulties with psychiatric inpatients.WAIS-R(韦氏成人智力量表修订版)项目对精神科住院患者的难度
J Clin Psychol. 1993 Nov;49(6):860-74. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199311)49:6<860::aid-jclp2270490614>3.0.co;2-n.
5
On rearranging picture arrangement: data from a clinical sample.关于重新排列图片布局:来自临床样本的数据。
Percept Mot Skills. 1987 Jun;64(3 Pt 2):1199-202. doi: 10.2466/pms.1987.64.3c.1199.
6
Cognitive deficits in schizophrenia on the WAIS-R NI Sentence Arrangement Subtest. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised Neuropsychological Inventory.精神分裂症患者在韦氏成人智力量表修订版神经心理测验的句子排列分测验中的认知缺陷。韦氏成人智力量表修订版神经心理量表。
J Clin Psychol. 1999 Sep;55(9):1085-94. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(199909)55:9<1085::aid-jclp6>3.0.co;2-g.
7
Detection of incomplete effort on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised: a cross-validation.韦氏成人智力量表修订版中不充分努力的检测:一项交叉验证研究
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1998 Apr;20(2):167-73. doi: 10.1076/jcen.20.2.167.1171.
8
Criterion validity of new WAIS-II subtest scores after traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后新韦氏成人智力量表第二版(WAIS-II)分测验分数的效标效度
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2001 Nov;7(7):892-8.
9
Item difficulty scaling for WAIS-III picture arrangement.韦氏成人智力量表第三版图片排列分测验的项目难度标定
J Clin Psychol. 2005 Jun;61(6):781-6. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20059.
10
Validation of WAIS-III four-subtest short forms in patients with traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤患者中韦氏成人智力量表第三版四个分测验简版的效度验证。
Appl Neuropsychol. 2011 Oct;18(4):291-7. doi: 10.1080/09084282.2011.595456.