Shaffer R A, Charlton D G, Hermesch C B
Dunn Dental Clinic, Department of General Dentistry, Lackland AFB, TX 78236-5551, USA.
Oper Dent. 1998 Jul-Aug;23(4):168-72.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the repair shear bond strengths of three resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials repaired at two different times. Thirty specimens of Fuji II LC, Vitremer, and Photac-Fil were prepared in cavities (2 mm x 7 mm) cut into acrylic resin cylinders. After the initial fill, half of the specimens were repaired 5 minutes later and half 1 week later. The specimens were stored in 37 degrees C distilled water when not being repaired or tested. Repairs were made without any surface preparation of the initial fill. Each specimen was mixed according to the manufacturer's directions, placed in the preparation in 1-mm increments and photocured for 40 seconds. The last increment was covered with a plastic strip and a glass slide before curing to create a smooth surface. Repairs were accomplished by drying the specimen for 10 seconds, then adding the new material to the unprepared surface using a 3-mm-thick polytetrafluoroethylene mold. The specimens were thermocycled 500 times, stored in 37 degrees C distilled water for 1 week, then loaded to failure in shear at a rate of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA and Z-value multiple comparison test to determine significant differences at the 0.05 significance level. Vitremer showed no significant difference in shear bond strength for 5-minute and 1-week repair periods, while Fuji II LC and Photac-Fil did. Repair bond strength of Vitremer was significantly greater than Fuji II LC and Photac-Fil at both repair times. This study showed that time of repair significantly affected the bond strength of two of the materials tested.
本研究的目的是评估三种树脂改性玻璃离子修复材料在两个不同时间点进行修复后的剪切粘结强度。在丙烯酸树脂圆柱体上切割出(2毫米×7毫米)的窝洞,制备30个富士II LC、Vitremer和Photac - Fil样本。初次充填后,一半样本在5分钟后进行修复,另一半在1周后进行修复。未进行修复或测试时,样本储存在37℃的蒸馏水中。修复时对初次充填物未进行任何表面处理。每个样本按照制造商的说明进行混合,以1毫米的增量放置在窝洞中并光固化40秒。最后一层增量在固化前用塑料条和载玻片覆盖以形成光滑表面。通过将样本干燥10秒,然后使用3毫米厚的聚四氟乙烯模具将新材料添加到未处理的表面来完成修复。样本进行500次热循环,在37℃的蒸馏水中储存1周,然后以0.5毫米/分钟的速率加载直至剪切破坏。使用单向方差分析和Z值多重比较检验分析数据,以确定在0.05显著性水平上的显著差异。Vitremer在5分钟和1周修复期的剪切粘结强度无显著差异,而富士II LC和Photac - Fil有差异。在两个修复时间点,Vitremer的修复粘结强度均显著高于富士II LC和Photac - Fil。本研究表明,修复时间显著影响了所测试的两种材料的粘结强度。