Soballa T, Wüster C, Schlegel J, Cadossi R, Isani R, Battista S, Heilmann P, Ziegler R
Dept. of Internal Medicine I, Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Heidelberg, Germany.
Horm Metab Res. 1998 Aug;30(8):536-41. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-978928.
The distal metaphysis of the first phalanx of the fingers II-V is, like the vertebral body, a useful site for the measurement of mineralisation and structure of the bone because of the simultaneous presence of compact and trabecular bone. With an ultrasound device (DBM sonic 1200, IGEA, Italy), we measured the adSOS (the amplitude dependent speed of sound) and the UBPS (ultrasound bone profile score), a score which is calculated from the graphic traces of the receiving probe with an expert system which uses fuzzy-logic at phalanges II-IV, as well as bone mineral density (BMD) at lumbar spine using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Precision of the measurements was as follows: adSOS: short-time-CV% = 0.576, long-time-CV% = 1.1, SCV% = 5.9, RMSSD% = 1.825. UBPS: short-time CV% = 5.95. There was no correlation between adSOS or UBPS and lumbar BMD (DXA). There was a significant positive correlation between adSOS and UBPS, r = 0.804 (p<0.00001). The validity of adSOS and UBPS was examined in 25 young and healthy women (mean age: 33.4 year), 15 postmenopausal healthy women (mean age: 58.5 years), 17 women with osteopenia, (mean age: 52.4 years), as defined by a t-score between -1 to -2.5 SD as lumbar BMD (DXA), and 20 women with osteoporosis and vertebral fractures (mean age: 61.4 years). We compared the healthy postmenopausal women and the women with osteoporotic vertebral fractures, the z-score of the adSOS was below minus 1.5 SD and UBPS was below 40, sensitivity was 0.7 for adSOS, and 0.85 for UBPS, with a specificity 0.97 for adSOS, and of 0.93 for UBPS; positive predictive value: adSOS: 0.93, UBPS: 0.85. AdSOS declined with age (r= 0.694, p=0.021); the UBPS was not age dependent (r=-0.15, p = n.s.). The ROC-curve shows a value of 0.96 for adSOS and 0.94 for UBPS. AdSOS and UBPS could discriminate well between the healthy controls and the women with osteopenia or vertebral fractures (p<0.00001). These results show that adSOS and UBPS are precise parameters to be measured at the phalanges. The detection level of pathological changes in osteoporosis are similar between adSOS and lumbar BMD (DXA) and improved by using the UBPS. This might be explained by the influence of structural changes in bone on UBPS, rather than change in bone mineral alone. Prospective studies have to clarify the role of adSOS and UBPS in fracture prediction.
手指II-V近节指骨的远侧干骺端与椎体一样,由于同时存在密质骨和松质骨,是测量骨矿化和骨结构的有用部位。我们使用超声设备(DBM sonic 1200,IGEA,意大利)测量了adSOS(振幅依赖声速)和UBPS(超声骨轮廓评分),UBPS是通过专家系统根据接收探头在II-IV指骨处的图形轨迹计算得出的,该专家系统使用模糊逻辑,同时使用双能X线吸收法(DXA)测量腰椎的骨密度(BMD)。测量的精密度如下:adSOS:短期CV% = 0.576,长期CV% = 1.1,SCV% = 5.9,RMSSD% = 1.825。UBPS:短期CV% = 5.95。adSOS或UBPS与腰椎BMD(DXA)之间无相关性。adSOS与UBPS之间存在显著正相关,r = 0.804(p<0.00001)。在25名年轻健康女性(平均年龄:33.4岁)、15名绝经后健康女性(平均年龄:58.5岁)、17名骨量减少女性(平均年龄:52.4岁,根据腰椎BMD(DXA)的t值在-1至-2.5 SD之间定义)和20名患有骨质疏松症和椎体骨折的女性(平均年龄:61.4岁)中检查了adSOS和UBPS的有效性。我们比较了健康绝经后女性和患有骨质疏松性椎体骨折的女性,adSOS的z值低于-1.5 SD且UBPS低于40,adSOS的敏感性为0.7,UBPS的敏感性为0.85,adSOS的特异性为0.97,UBPS的特异性为0.93;阳性预测值:adSOS:0.93,UBPS:0.85。adSOS随年龄下降(r = 0.694,p = 0.021);UBPS与年龄无关(r = -0.15,p = 无显著性差异)。ROC曲线显示adSOS的值为0.96,UBPS的值为0.94。adSOS和UBPS能够很好地区分健康对照组与骨量减少或椎体骨折的女性(p<0.00001)。这些结果表明,adSOS和UBPS是在指骨处测量的精确参数。骨质疏松症病理变化的检测水平在adSOS和腰椎BMD(DXA)之间相似,并且通过使用UBPS得到改善。这可能是由于骨结构变化对UBPS的影响,而不仅仅是骨矿物质的变化。前瞻性研究必须阐明adSOS和UBPS在骨折预测中的作用。