Soballa T, Schlegel J, Cadossi R, Isani R, Heilmann P, Ziegler R, Wüster C
Innere Medizin I, Endokrinologie und Stoffwechsel, Krehl-Klinik, Heidelberg.
Med Klin (Munich). 1998 Mar 15;93(3):131-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03044830.
The distal metaphysis of the first phalanx of the fingers II to V is, like the vertebral body, a useful site for the measurement of mineralisation and structure of the bone, because of the simultaneous presence of compact and trabecular bone.
With an osteosonographic device (DBM sonic 1200, IGEA, Italy) we measured in 38 young and healthy men, 14 elderly and healthy men, 18 men with osteopenia, 8 men with osteoporosis and vertebral fractures and 10 men with long-standing cortisone medication, the adSOS (amplitude-dependent speed of sound) and the UBPS (ultrasound bone profile score) at the phalanges, as well as bone mineral density (BMD) at lumbar spine using dual-X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
There was no correlation between adSOS or UBPS and lumbar BMD (DXA). There was a significant positive correlation between adSOS and UBPS, r = 0.826 (p < 0.00001). AdSOS declined with age (r = 0.694, p = 0.021); the UBPS was not age-dependent (r = -0.15, p = n.s.), as expected. AdSOS and UBPS could discriminate significantly between the young and healthy controls and the men with osteopenia/vertebral fractures or oral steroids (p < 0.00001). The DXA could be significantly discriminate all healthy controls from the patients with osteopenia or vertebral fractures. It could not significantly discriminate the healthy controls from the patients taking oral glucoconticoids. Only the UBPS could significantly discriminate this group from the healthy controls.
These results show, that adSOS and UBPS are precise parameters to be measured at the phalanges. The detection level of pathological changes in osteoporosis are similar between adSOS and lumbar BMD (DXA) and improved by using UBPS. This might be explained by the influence of structural changes in bone on UBPS, rather than changes in bone mineral alone. Prospective studies have to clarify the role of adSOS and UBPS in fracture prediction.
由于同时存在密质骨和小梁骨,手指II至V第一指骨的远侧干骺端与椎体一样,是测量骨矿化和骨结构的有用部位。
我们使用骨超声设备(DBM sonic 1200,IGEA,意大利),对38名年轻健康男性、14名老年健康男性、18名骨质减少男性、8名患有骨质疏松症和椎体骨折的男性以及10名长期服用皮质醇药物的男性,测量了指骨处的振幅依赖声速(adSOS)和超声骨轮廓评分(UBPS),并使用双能X线吸收法(DXA)测量了腰椎的骨密度(BMD)。
adSOS或UBPS与腰椎BMD(DXA)之间无相关性。adSOS与UBPS之间存在显著正相关,r = 0.826(p < 0.00001)。adSOS随年龄下降(r = 0.694,p = 0.021);正如预期的那样,UBPS与年龄无关(r = -0.15,p =无统计学意义)。adSOS和UBPS能够显著区分年轻健康对照组与骨质减少/椎体骨折或口服类固醇的男性(p < 0.00001)。DXA能够显著区分所有健康对照组与骨质减少或椎体骨折患者。它不能显著区分健康对照组与口服糖皮质激素患者。只有UBPS能够显著区分该组与健康对照组。
这些结果表明,adSOS和UBPS是在指骨处测量的精确参数。骨质疏松症病理变化的检测水平在adSOS和腰椎BMD(DXA)之间相似,并且通过使用UBPS得到改善。这可能是由于骨结构变化对UBPS的影响,而不仅仅是骨矿物质的变化。前瞻性研究必须阐明adSOS和UBPS在骨折预测中的作用。