Geng M, Wallrapp C, Müller-Pillasch F, Frohme M, Hoheisel J D, Gress T M
Abteilung Innere Medizin I, Universität Ulm, Germany.
Biotechniques. 1998 Sep;25(3):434-8. doi: 10.2144/98253st05.
The difference products (DP) of representational difference analyses (RDA) were used as hybridization probes on cDNA arrays. The effectivity of RDA products obtained with increasing driver/tester ratios (DP 1 = 100:1, DP 2 = 800:1 and DP 3 = 400,000:1) to isolate differentially expressed genes was compared with the effectivity of conventional differential hybridizations. Pacreatic cancer and control tissues were used as a test system to isolate differentially expressed genes. The use of RDA products as hybridization probes showed two major advantages: (i) a reliable identification of true differential signals; and (ii) only one autoradiograph had to be analyzed, which eliminated the need for a laborious subtraction of signal intensities obtained with different cDNA probes. Increasing driver/tester ratios in iterative rounds of RDA delivered more specific results, though the total yield of differential clones was gradually reduced. In this situation, the intermediate RDA product DP 2 provided the best compromise.
代表性差异分析(RDA)的差异产物(DP)被用作cDNA阵列上的杂交探针。将以递增的驱动子/测试子比例(DP 1 = 100:1、DP 2 = 800:1和DP 3 = 400,000:1)获得的RDA产物用于分离差异表达基因的有效性与传统差异杂交的有效性进行了比较。胰腺癌组织和对照组织被用作分离差异表达基因的测试系统。使用RDA产物作为杂交探针显示出两个主要优点:(i)可靠地鉴定真正的差异信号;(ii)只需分析一张放射自显影片,从而无需费力地减去用不同cDNA探针获得的信号强度。在RDA的迭代轮次中增加驱动子/测试子比例可产生更特异的结果,尽管差异克隆的总产量逐渐降低。在这种情况下,中间的RDA产物DP 2提供了最佳折衷方案。