• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Potential impact of antiarrhythmic drugs versus implantable defibrillators on the management of ventricular arrhythmias: the Midlands trial of empirical amiodarone versus electrophysiologically guided intervention and cardioverter implant registry data.抗心律失常药物与植入式除颤器对室性心律失常治疗的潜在影响:米德兰兹经验性胺碘酮与电生理指导干预及心脏复律除颤器植入登记数据试验
Heart. 1998 Jul;80(1):68-70.
2
The Midlands Trial of Empirical Amiodarone versus Electrophysiology-guided Interventions and Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillators (MAVERIC): a multi-centre prospective randomised clinical trial on the secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death.米德兰兹经验性胺碘酮与电生理引导干预及植入式心脏复律除颤器试验(MAVERIC):一项关于心脏性猝死二级预防的多中心前瞻性随机临床试验。
Europace. 2004 Jul;6(4):257-66. doi: 10.1016/j.eupc.2004.03.009.
3
A comparison of the AVID and DAVID trials of implantable defibrillators.植入式除颤器的AVID试验与DAVID试验的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2005 Jun 15;95(12):1431-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.02.008.
4
Antiarrhythmic drug use in the implantable defibrillator arm of the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Study.抗心律失常药物与植入式除颤器(AVID)研究中植入式除颤器组的抗心律失常药物使用情况。
Am Heart J. 2001 Sep;142(3):520-9. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2001.117129.
5
The Italian Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Registry. A survey of the national activity during the years 2001-2003.意大利植入式心脏复律除颤器注册研究。2001 - 2003年全国活动调查。
Ital Heart J. 2005 Mar;6(3):272-80.
6
Are implantable cardioverter-defibrillators or drugs more effective in prolonging life? The Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Trial Executive Committee.
Am J Cardiol. 1997 Mar 1;79(5):661-3.
7
Implantable defibrillators and/or amiodarone: alternatives or complementary therapies.
Int J Clin Pract. 1998 Sep;52(6):425-8.
8
Effect of concomitant antiarrhythmic therapy on survival in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators.植入式心脏复律除颤器患者联合抗心律失常治疗对生存率的影响。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005 Jul;28(7):647-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00164.x.
9
Long-term comparison of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator versus amiodarone: eleven-year follow-up of a subset of patients in the Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study (CIDS).植入式心脏复律除颤器与胺碘酮的长期比较:加拿大植入式除颤器研究(CIDS)中部分患者的11年随访
Circulation. 2004 Jul 13;110(2):112-6. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000134957.51747.6E. Epub 2004 Jul 6.
10
Meta-analysis of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator secondary prevention trials. AVID, CASH and CIDS studies. Antiarrhythmics vs Implantable Defibrillator study. Cardiac Arrest Study Hamburg . Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study.植入式心脏复律除颤器二级预防试验的荟萃分析。AVID、CASH和CIDS研究。抗心律失常药物与植入式除颤器研究。汉堡心脏骤停研究。加拿大植入式除颤器研究。
Eur Heart J. 2000 Dec;21(24):2071-8. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2000.2476.

引用本文的文献

1
Are implantable cardioverter- defibrillators cost-effective?
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2000 Jul;2(4):341-5. doi: 10.1007/s11886-000-0091-5.
2
Antiarrhythmic management and implantable defibrillator use in survivors of prehospital cardiac arrest without myocardial infarction in West Yorkshire.西约克郡院外心脏骤停且无心肌梗死幸存者的抗心律失常治疗及植入式除颤器的使用
Heart. 2000 Mar;83(3):312-5. doi: 10.1136/heart.83.3.312.
3
Audit of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in a single UK centre.英国某单一中心的植入式心脏复律除颤器审计。
BMJ. 1999 May 22;318(7195):1416-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7195.1416a.

本文引用的文献

1
Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial Investigators.植入式除颤器可提高冠心病合并室性心律失常高危患者的生存率。多中心自动除颤器植入试验研究者。
N Engl J Med. 1996 Dec 26;335(26):1933-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199612263352601.
2
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator compared with antiarrhythmic drug treatment in cardiac arrest survivors (the Cardiac Arrest Study Hamburg).心脏骤停幸存者中植入式心脏复律除颤器与抗心律失常药物治疗的比较(汉堡心脏骤停研究)
Am Heart J. 1994 Apr;127(4 Pt 2):1139-44. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(94)90101-5.
3
The automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: an overview.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985 Aug;6(2):461-6. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(85)80186-8.
4
Survival after implantation of the cardioverter defibrillator.
Am J Cardiol. 1992 Apr 1;69(9):899-903. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90789-2.

抗心律失常药物与植入式除颤器对室性心律失常治疗的潜在影响:米德兰兹经验性胺碘酮与电生理指导干预及心脏复律除颤器植入登记数据试验

Potential impact of antiarrhythmic drugs versus implantable defibrillators on the management of ventricular arrhythmias: the Midlands trial of empirical amiodarone versus electrophysiologically guided intervention and cardioverter implant registry data.

作者信息

Pathmanathan R K, Lau E W, Cooper J, Newton L, Skehan J D, Garratt C J, Griffith M J

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Glenfield Hospital NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.

出版信息

Heart. 1998 Jul;80(1):68-70.

PMID:9764063
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1728754/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Survival was prolonged in selected patients with sustained ventricular arrhythmias who received implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in the antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators (AVID) study. The Midlands trial of empirical amiodarone versus electrophysiologically guided intervention and cardioverter implant in ventricular arrhythmias (MAVERIC) registry is a population based trial.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the number of patients who satisfy the AVID criteria because of the high cost of ICDs.

DESIGN

Observational study, based on a continuing trial.

SETTING

All coronary care units in the Midlands region in the United Kingdom (population 9.1 million).

PATIENTS

Patients presenting to a coronary care unit with sustained ventricular arrhythmias not related to an acute myocardial infarction are entered onto the registry. Those who consent to the MAVERIC study are randomised to receive either empirical amiodarone or electrophysiologically guided treatment. Demographic data, details of clinical presentation, and echocardiographic findings are collected. These data have been used to calculate the number of patients who satisfy the AVID criteria and would benefit from ICD implantation. The financial implications have been calculated for the region and nationally.

RESULTS

132 patients were entered onto the registry during the first five months of the MAVERIC study; 69 patients fulfilled the AVID criteria. Extrapolation of these data over a 12 month period suggests implantation of at least 166 new ICDs (compared with 23 implants in 1996). This would increase the UK ICD implant rate from five to at least 18 per million of the population, costing the National Health Service 24.1 Pounds million per annum.

CONCLUSION

Application of the AVID criteria in the UK will cause a great increase in the ICD implant rate, with serious financial implications.

摘要

背景

在抗心律失常药物与植入式除颤器(AVID)研究中,植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)可延长部分持续性室性心律失常患者的生存期。米德兰兹经验性胺碘酮与室性心律失常的电生理指导干预及心脏复律器植入试验(MAVERIC)登记研究是一项基于人群的试验。

目的

确定因ICD成本高昂而符合AVID标准的患者数量。

设计

基于一项正在进行的试验的观察性研究。

地点

英国米德兰兹地区的所有冠心病监护病房(人口910万)。

患者

因持续性室性心律失常入住冠心病监护病房且与急性心肌梗死无关的患者被纳入登记研究。同意参加MAVERIC研究的患者被随机分配接受经验性胺碘酮治疗或电生理指导治疗。收集人口统计学数据、临床表现细节和超声心动图检查结果。这些数据已用于计算符合AVID标准且将从ICD植入中获益的患者数量。已计算该地区及全国的经济影响。

结果

在MAVERIC研究的前五个月,132名患者被纳入登记研究;69名患者符合AVID标准。将这些数据外推至12个月期间表明,至少需要植入166台新的ICD(相比1996年的23台植入量)。这将使英国的ICD植入率从每百万人口5台增加到至少18台,每年将花费国民医疗服务体系2410万英镑。

结论

在英国应用AVID标准将导致ICD植入率大幅上升,带来严重的经济影响。