de Grauw W J, van den Hoogen H J, van de Lisdonk E H, van Gerwen W H, van Weel C
Department of General Practice and Social Medicine, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 Apr;52 Suppl 1:9S-12S.
Control group characteristics as comorbidity and chronic psychosocial problems may play an important part in study outcomes. A primary care data base was used to quantify the effects of varying the case mix of participants.
Historical cohort study.
Data were collected from 1967-1996 in four Dutch general practices performing the Continuous Morbidity Registration Nijmegen.
All newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients in the period 1967-1989 fulfilling the WHO criteria (n = 265); for each type 2 diabetic patient a control was matched for practice, sex, age, and social class; from these controls subgroups were selected based on the absence of different types of morbidity; these subgroups were also matched for practice, sex, age, and social class.
The relative risk of mortality in type 2 diabetic patients in comparison with various subsets of controls ranged from 1.33 (95% CI 0.97, 1.81) to 2.16 (95% CI 1.46, 3.20).
Control group characteristics as comorbidity and chronic psychosocial problems turned out to influence the risk estimation in a cohort study. General practice data enhance the study of these aspects.
作为合并症和慢性社会心理问题的对照组特征可能在研究结果中起重要作用。使用初级保健数据库来量化改变参与者病例组合的影响。
历史性队列研究。
数据收集于1967年至1996年期间,来自荷兰四家进行奈梅亨连续发病登记的全科诊所。
1967年至1989年期间所有新诊断的符合世界卫生组织标准的2型糖尿病患者(n = 265);为每位2型糖尿病患者匹配一名在诊所、性别、年龄和社会阶层方面与之相同的对照;从这些对照中,根据是否存在不同类型的疾病选择亚组;这些亚组在诊所、性别、年龄和社会阶层方面也进行了匹配。
2型糖尿病患者与各种对照亚组相比的死亡相对风险范围为1.33(95%可信区间0.97, 1.81)至2.16(95%可信区间1.46, 3.20)。
结果表明,作为合并症和慢性社会心理问题的对照组特征会影响队列研究中的风险估计。全科医疗数据有助于对这些方面进行研究。