Juffermans N P, Verbon A, Danner S A, Kuijper E J, Speelman P
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
AIDS. 1998 Sep 10;12(13):1661-6. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199813000-00014.
Mycobacterium xenopi is associated with pulmonary disease in patients with loss of local or general host defence.
To determine the occurrence of M. xenopi in our hospital during 1987-1992 and 1993-1996, as well as the association of M. xenopi with HIV infection in 1993-1996; to evaluate the clinical significance of M. xenopi in HIV-seropositive patients.
Retrospective review of charts and classification of patients based on earlier definitions derived from the American Thoracic Society.
Tertiary hospital.
Patients with a positive isolate of M. xenopi from January 1987 until December 1996.
During 1993 1996, a significant increase in the number of patients with M. xenopi was found compared with 1987-1992. Of 25 patients, 22 were HIV-seropositive.
The HIV-seropositive patients were classified as having definite (n = 5), probable (n = 9) and unlikely disease (n = 8) due to M. xenopi. Symptoms, median CD4 cell count, treatment and outcome did not differ between these groups.
M. xenopi is an emerging pathogen, especially in HIV-infected patients. The criteria of the American Thoracic Society for disease due to non-tuberculous mycobacteria do not seem applicable to M. xenopi in HIV-infected patients. We suggest that two positive cultures of M. xenopi and no other likely cause of symptoms present should be considered the criteria for diagnosis of M. xenopi disease in HIV-infected patients.
偶发分枝杆菌与局部或全身宿主防御功能丧失的患者的肺部疾病有关。
确定1987 - 1992年和1993 - 1996年我院偶发分枝杆菌的发生情况,以及1993 - 1996年偶发分枝杆菌与HIV感染的关联;评估偶发分枝杆菌在HIV血清学阳性患者中的临床意义。
根据美国胸科学会早期定义对病历进行回顾性审查并对患者进行分类。
三级医院。
1987年1月至1996年12月偶发分枝杆菌分离株阳性的患者。
1993 - 1996年期间,与1987 - 1992年相比,偶发分枝杆菌患者数量显著增加。25例患者中,22例HIV血清学阳性。
HIV血清学阳性患者根据偶发分枝杆菌感染被分类为确诊(n = 5)、可能(n = 9)和不太可能患病(n = 8)。这些组之间的症状、CD4细胞计数中位数、治疗和结局无差异。
偶发分枝杆菌是一种新兴病原体,尤其是在HIV感染患者中。美国胸科学会关于非结核分枝杆菌病的标准似乎不适用于HIV感染患者中的偶发分枝杆菌。我们建议,在没有其他可能的症状原因的情况下,两次偶发分枝杆菌培养阳性应被视为HIV感染患者偶发分枝杆菌病的诊断标准。