Teramoto S, Bartlett J S, McCarty D, Xiao X, Samulski R J, Boucher R C
CF/Pulmonary Research and Treatment Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
J Virol. 1998 Nov;72(11):8904-12. doi: 10.1128/JVI.72.11.8904-8912.1998.
Adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors appear promising for use in gene therapy in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients, yet many features of AAV-mediated gene transfer to airway epithelial cells are not well understood. We compared the transduction efficiencies of AAV vectors and adenovirus (Ad) vectors in immortalized cell lines from CF patients and in nasal epithelial primary cultures from normal humans and CF patients. Similar dose-dependent relationships between the vector multiplicities of infection and the efficiencies of lacZ gene transfer were observed. However, levels of transduction for both Ad and recombinant AAV (rAAV) were significantly lower in the airway epithelial cell than in the control cell lines HeLa and HEK 293. Transduction efficiencies differed among cultured epithelial cell types, with poorly differentiated cells transducing more efficiently than well-differentiated cells. A time-dependent increase in gene expression was observed after infection for both vectors. For Ad, but not for AAV, this increase was dependent on prolonged incubation of cells with the vector. Furthermore, for rAAV (but not for rAd), the delay in maximal transduction could be abrogated by wild-type Ad helper infection. Thus, although helper virus is not required for maximal transduction, it increases the kinetics by which this is achieved. Expression of Ad E4 open reading frame 6 or addition of either hydroxyurea or camptothecin resulted in increased AAV transduction, as previously demonstrated for nonairway cells (albeit to lower final levels), suggesting that second-strand synthesis may not be the sole cause of inefficient transduction. Finally, the efficiency of AAV-mediated ex vivo gene transfer to lung cells was similar to that previously described for Ad vectors in that transduction was limited to regions of epithelial injury and preferentially targeted basal-like cells. These studies address the primary factors influencing rAAV infection of human airway cells and should impact successful gene delivery in CF patients.
腺相关病毒(AAV)载体在囊性纤维化(CF)患者的基因治疗中似乎很有前景,但AAV介导的基因转移至气道上皮细胞的许多特性尚未完全了解。我们比较了AAV载体和腺病毒(Ad)载体在CF患者永生化细胞系以及正常人和CF患者鼻上皮原代培养物中的转导效率。观察到感染复数与lacZ基因转移效率之间存在相似的剂量依赖性关系。然而,Ad和重组AAV(rAAV)在气道上皮细胞中的转导水平均显著低于对照细胞系HeLa和HEK 293。不同培养的上皮细胞类型转导效率不同,分化程度低的细胞比分化良好的细胞转导效率更高。两种载体感染后均观察到基因表达随时间增加。对于Ad而非AAV,这种增加依赖于细胞与载体的长时间孵育。此外,对于rAAV(而非rAd),野生型Ad辅助病毒感染可消除最大转导延迟。因此,尽管最大转导不需要辅助病毒,但它可提高实现最大转导的动力学。如先前在非气道细胞中所证明的(尽管最终水平较低),Ad E4开放阅读框6的表达或添加羟基脲或喜树碱会导致AAV转导增加,这表明第二链合成可能不是转导效率低下的唯一原因。最后,AAV介导的离体基因转移至肺细胞的效率与先前描述的Ad载体相似,即转导仅限于上皮损伤区域,并优先靶向基底样细胞。这些研究探讨了影响rAAV感染人气道细胞的主要因素,应会影响CF患者基因递送的成功。