Burgess C D
Capital Coast Health Ltd, Wellington.
N Z Med J. 1998 Aug 28;111(1072):314-5.
This audit was performed to ascertain whether the admission of patients to the General Medical Unit (Wellington Hospital) for one day or less was appropriate.
Between 1 July 1996 and 30 June 1997, 494 patients were admitted to General Medicine for one day or less. The medical records for a random sample of 245 patients were reviewed. A modification of the Oxford Bed Study Instrument was used to assess the appropriateness of admission.
Twenty admissions (8.2%) were deemed inappropriate, six patients could have been referred to medical outpatients, four were known epileptics who presented following a seizure, and none of the others merited admission on severity criteria. Ten patients were triaged after 10.00 pm, when discharge becomes more difficult. Forty-two patients required an investigation which delayed discharge.
With the present community and investigation facilities available, there is no evidence that the majority of 24-hour admissions to acute General Medicine are inappropriate.
本次审计旨在确定患者入住(惠灵顿医院)普通内科病房一天及以内是否合理。
在1996年7月1日至1997年6月30日期间,494名患者入住普通内科病房一天及以内。对随机抽取的245名患者的病历进行了审查。采用牛津床位研究工具的一种改良版来评估入院的合理性。
20例入院(8.2%)被认为不合理,6名患者本可转诊至内科门诊,4名是癫痫患者,发作后前来就诊,其他患者根据病情严重程度均不值得入院。10名患者在晚上10点后接受分诊,此时出院变得更加困难。42名患者需要进行检查,这延迟了出院。
鉴于现有的社区和检查设施,没有证据表明大多数急性普通内科24小时入院是不合理的。