Flanagan W M
Department of Cell Biology, Gilead Sciences, USA.
Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1998 Jun;17(2):169-76. doi: 10.1023/a:1006098218335.
During the last ten years, antisense technology has experienced growing pains not unlike those of adolescence. In 1992, antisense was trumpeted as one of the top 10 emerging research areas. However, 3 years later, researchers were confronted with significant problems associated with antisense oligonucleotides ranging from sequence-dependent, non-antisense effects in vitro to dose-limiting toxicities in preclinical models [1-3]. Many researchers had doubts whether sequence-specific antisense even existed or whether it would ever exist as a therapeutic strategy [4]. Despite these gloomy predictions, many of the challenges facing the development of antisense-based drugs as therapeutics have been overcome as evidenced by the progress of several antisense oligonucleotides in the clinic for the treatment of cancer.
在过去十年里,反义技术经历了类似青春期的成长烦恼。1992年,反义技术被誉为十大新兴研究领域之一。然而,三年后,研究人员面临着与反义寡核苷酸相关的重大问题,从体外序列依赖性非反义效应到临床前模型中的剂量限制性毒性[1 - 3]。许多研究人员怀疑序列特异性反义是否真的存在,或者它是否能作为一种治疗策略存在[4]。尽管有这些悲观的预测,但基于反义的药物作为治疗手段开发所面临的许多挑战已经被克服,几种反义寡核苷酸在癌症治疗临床中的进展就是明证。