• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Psychotherapy and disclosure: recent court decisions.

作者信息

Furlong A, Lefebvre M S

出版信息

Can J Psychiatry. 1998 Sep;43(7):731-6. doi: 10.1177/070674379804300708.

DOI:10.1177/070674379804300708
PMID:9773223
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To encourage mental health professionals concerned about the practice of psychotherapy to add their voices to the legal debate on disclosure.

METHOD

Analysis of recent court decisions, in particular 2 Supreme Court of Canada judgements, R. v. O'Connor and R. v. Carosella, and 1 United States Supreme Court judgement, Jaffee v. Redmond.

RESULTS

The lack of a common definition of psychotherapy may, in part, have made it awkward for mental health professionals to mount a concerted defence of psychotherapy dossiers.

CONCLUSIONS

Unless mental health professionals develop a more robust justification and delimitation for privilege, in Canadian courts possible relevance of clinical material is likely to override concern for the patient's privacy interest. Future research might evaluate the impact of loss of privilege upon different types of psychotherapy.

摘要

相似文献

1
Psychotherapy and disclosure: recent court decisions.
Can J Psychiatry. 1998 Sep;43(7):731-6. doi: 10.1177/070674379804300708.
2
The ethical and legal implications of Jaffee v Redmond and the HIPAA medical privacy rule for psychotherapy and general psychiatry.贾菲诉雷德蒙德案的伦理与法律影响以及《健康保险流通与责任法案》中关于心理治疗和普通精神病学的医疗隐私规则
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2002 Sep;25(3):575-84, vi-vii. doi: 10.1016/s0193-953x(01)00013-2.
3
Correction to "Empirical support for the United States Supreme Court's protection of the psychotherapist-patient privilege".对《美国最高法院对心理治疗师 - 患者特权保护的实证支持》的勘误
Ethics Behav. 2004;14(2):197-9. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb1402_7.
4
Empirical support for the United States Supreme Court's protection of the psychotherapist-patient privilege.美国最高法院对心理治疗师-患者特权保护的实证支持。
Ethics Behav. 2003;13(4):385-400. doi: 10.1207/S15327019EB1304_6.
5
Jaffee v. Redmond: making the courts a tool of injustice?
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1997;25(3):383-9.
6
Rationales for the confidentiality of psychotherapist-patient communications: testimonial privilege and the Constitution.
Houst Law Rev. 1998 Spring;35(1):187-226.
7
Privacy, consent, and the electronic mental health record: The Person vs. the System.隐私、同意与电子心理健康记录:个人与系统之争。
J Psychiatr Pract. 2012 Jan;18(1):46-50. doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000410987.38723.47.
8
Jaffee v. Redmond: psychotherapist-patient privilege in the federal courts.
Psychiatr Serv. 1996 Oct;47(10):1033-4, 1052. doi: 10.1176/ps.47.10.1033.
9
Supreme Court protects communications in psychotherapy.最高法院保护心理治疗中的交流内容。
J Law Med Ethics. 1996 Winter;24(4):388-9.
10
"I'm your therapist, you can tell me anything": the Supreme Court confirm psychotherapist-patient privilege in Jaffee v. Redmond.
De Paul Law Rev. 1998 Spring;47(3):701-41.