Rosal M C, Ockene J K, Ma Y, Hebert J R, Ockene I S, Merriam P, Hurley T G
Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Worcester 01655, USA.
Health Psychol. 1998 Sep;17(5):476-8. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.17.5.476.
The authors compared the effect of a behavioral multicomponent smoking cessation special intervention (SI) to an advice-only intervention (AO) on smoking status at 5 years for smokers with coronary disease (n = 160). Regression analyses revealed an interaction between intervention type and disease severity such that patients in the SI group with greater degrees of coronary artery disease showed significantly higher cessation rates (odds ratio = 344 for 3-vessel disease in the SI vs. AO, p = .01). Factors predicting maintained abstinence included having 12 or more years of education, contemplating quitting smoking or being ready to begin action to quit at baseline, and having a higher self-efficacy score.
作者将一种行为多成分戒烟特殊干预措施(SI)与仅提供建议的干预措施(AO)对冠心病吸烟者(n = 160)5年吸烟状况的影响进行了比较。回归分析显示干预类型与疾病严重程度之间存在相互作用,即SI组中冠状动脉疾病程度较高的患者戒烟率显著更高(SI组与AO组相比,三支血管病变的优势比 = 344,p = 0.01)。预测持续戒烟的因素包括接受12年或以上教育、在基线时考虑戒烟或准备好开始戒烟行动,以及自我效能得分较高。