Suppr超能文献

颈动脉内膜切除术采用颈深丛或颈浅丛阻滞的前瞻性随机对照研究。

Prospective, randomized comparison of deep or superficial cervical plexus block for carotid endarterectomy surgery.

作者信息

Stoneham M D, Doyle A R, Knighton J D, Dorje P, Stanley J C

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 1998 Oct;89(4):907-12. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199810000-00015.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Carotid endarterectomy may be performed under cervical plexus block with local anesthetic supplementation by the surgeon as necessary during surgery. It is unclear, however, whether deep or superficial cervical plexus block offers the best operating conditions or patient satisfaction. Therefore, the authors compared the two in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

METHODS

Forty patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy were randomized to receive either a superficial or a deep cervical plexus block with 20 ml bupivacaine, 0.375%. Outcomes subjected to statistical analysis included supplemental anesthetic supplementation with lidocaine, 1%, by the surgeon, dermatomes affected by the block, paresthesia during block placement, postoperative pain scores, and analgesic requirements.

RESULTS

Median supplemental lidocaine requirements were 6 ml (range, 0.5 to 20 ml) in the deep block group and 6 ml (range, 0 to 20 ml) in the superficial block group (P = 0.7323). Patients in the deep block group who reported paresthesia during block placement required less lidocaine supplementation (median, 2; range, 0.5 to 20 ml) than the 9.5 ml (range, 6 to 15.5 ml) required by those who did not experience paresthesia (P = 0.0113). Compared with patients in the superficial block group, those in the deep block group were less likely to need analgesia in the first 24 h after operation (P = 0.047), and those who required analgesia received it later (6.6 +/- 4.1 vs. 3.9 +/- 1.4 h after operation; Student's t test, P = 0.02). One patient in each group expressed dissatisfaction with the technique.

CONCLUSIONS

Carotid endarterectomy may be performed satisfactorily during superficial or deep cervical plexus block placement with no differences in terms of supplemental local anesthetic requirements, although this is influenced by whether paresthesia is elicited during placement of the deep block. Therefore, the clinician's decision to use one block rather than another need not be based on any assumed superiority of one block based on intraoperative conditions or patient satisfaction.

摘要

背景

颈动脉内膜切除术可在颈丛阻滞下进行,术中必要时外科医生可补充局部麻醉药。然而,尚不清楚颈深丛阻滞还是颈浅丛阻滞能提供最佳的手术条件或患者满意度。因此,作者对接受颈动脉内膜切除术的患者的这两种阻滞方法进行了比较。

方法

40例接受颈动脉内膜切除术的患者被随机分为两组,分别接受用20毫升0.375%布比卡因进行的颈浅丛阻滞或颈深丛阻滞。进行统计分析的结果包括外科医生用1%利多卡因补充麻醉药的情况、阻滞影响的皮节、阻滞置管时的感觉异常、术后疼痛评分及镇痛需求。

结果

颈深丛阻滞组利多卡因补充量中位数为6毫升(范围0.5至20毫升),颈浅丛阻滞组为6毫升(范围0至20毫升)(P = 0.7323)。颈深丛阻滞组中置管时出现感觉异常的患者所需利多卡因补充量(中位数2毫升,范围0.5至20毫升)少于未出现感觉异常的患者所需的9.5毫升(范围6至15.5毫升)(P = 0.0113)。与颈浅丛阻滞组患者相比,颈深丛阻滞组患者术后24小时内需要镇痛的可能性较小(P = 0.047),且需要镇痛的患者接受镇痛的时间较晚(术后6.6±4.1小时对3.9±1.4小时;学生t检验,P = 0.02)。每组各有1例患者对该技术表示不满意。

结论

在进行颈浅丛或颈深丛阻滞时,均可令人满意地实施颈动脉内膜切除术,在补充局部麻醉药需求方面无差异,尽管这受深丛阻滞置管时是否引出感觉异常的影响。因此,临床医生决定使用一种阻滞而非另一种阻滞,不必基于术中情况或患者满意度方面任何一种阻滞的假定优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验