• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Differential effects of fosinopril and enalapril in patients with mild to moderate chronic heart failure. Fosinopril in Heart Failure Study Investigators.

作者信息

Zannad F, Chati Z, Guest M, Plat F

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Centre d'Investigation Clinique INSERM-CHU, University Henri Poincaré, Nancy, France.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 1998 Oct;136(4 Pt 1):672-80. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(98)70015-8.

DOI:10.1016/s0002-8703(98)70015-8
PMID:9778071
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy and safety of fosinopril in the treatment of chronic heart failure (CHF), patients with mild to moderate CHF and left ventricular ejection fractions <40% were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to receive fosinopril 5 to 20 mg every day (n = 122) or enalapril 5 to 20 mg every day (n = 132) for 1 year.

RESULTS

The event-free survival time was longer (1.6 vs 1.0 months, P= .032) and the total rate of hospitalizations plus deaths was smaller with fosinopril than with enalapril (19.7% vs 25.0%, P= .028). There was consistently better symptom improvement with fosinopril (P< .05). The incidence of orthostatic hypotension was lower in the fosinopril group (1.6% vs 7.6%, P< .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Fosinopril 5 to 20 mg every day was more effective in improving symptoms and delaying events related to worsening of CHF and produced less orthostatic hypotension than enalapril 5 to 20 mg every day.

摘要

相似文献

1
Differential effects of fosinopril and enalapril in patients with mild to moderate chronic heart failure. Fosinopril in Heart Failure Study Investigators.
Am Heart J. 1998 Oct;136(4 Pt 1):672-80. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(98)70015-8.
2
[Head-to-head comparison of clinical, biochemical and functional effects of fosinopril and enalapril in patients with systolic heart failure].福辛普利与依那普利对收缩性心力衰竭患者临床、生化及功能影响的头对头比较
Med Pregl. 2006 Jan-Feb;59(1-2):51-6. doi: 10.2298/mpns0602051o.
3
Fosinopril. A review of its pharmacology and clinical efficacy in the management of heart failure.福辛普利。其治疗心力衰竭的药理学及临床疗效综述。
Drugs. 1997 Jul;54(1):103-16. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199754010-00012.
4
Fosinopril attenuates clinical deterioration and improves exercise tolerance in patients with heart failure. Fosinopril Efficacy/Safety Trial (FEST) Study Group.
Eur Heart J. 1995 Dec;16(12):1892-9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060844.
5
[Hyperkalemia in hypertensive patients undergoing regular hemodialysis during enalapril and fosinopril therapy].[依那普利和福辛普利治疗期间接受规律血液透析的高血压患者的高钾血症]
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2006 Jan-Feb;134(1-2):44-8. doi: 10.2298/sarh0602044d.
6
Comparison of the safety and efficacy of delapril with enalapril in patients with congestive heart failure.
Am J Cardiol. 1995 Jun 16;75(18):25F-28F. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80511-6.
7
Tolerability of carvedilol and ACE-Inhibition in mild heart failure. Results of CARMEN (Carvedilol ACE-Inhibitor Remodelling Mild CHF EvaluatioN).卡维地洛与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂在轻度心力衰竭中的耐受性。卡门研究(卡维地洛血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂重塑轻度慢性心力衰竭评估)结果
Eur J Heart Fail. 2004 Jun;6(4):467-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejheart.2003.12.019.
8
Effects of atenolol as add-on therapy to fosinopril in heart failure.阿替洛尔作为福辛普利的附加疗法治疗心力衰竭的效果。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1997 Apr 11;109(7):232-8.
9
Short- and long-term effects of early fosinopril administration in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction undergoing intravenous thrombolysis: results from the Fosinopril in Acute Myocardial Infarction Study. FAMIS Working Party.早期服用福辛普利对接受静脉溶栓治疗的急性前壁心肌梗死患者的短期和长期影响:急性心肌梗死福辛普利研究结果。FAMIS工作小组
Am Heart J. 1998 Aug;136(2):213-25. doi: 10.1053/hj.1998.v136.89745.
10
Comparison of omapatrilat and enalapril in patients with chronic heart failure: the Omapatrilat Versus Enalapril Randomized Trial of Utility in Reducing Events (OVERTURE).奥美沙坦酯与依那普利治疗慢性心力衰竭患者的比较:奥美沙坦酯与依那普利降低事件发生率随机效用试验(OVERTURE)。
Circulation. 2002 Aug 20;106(8):920-6. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000029801.86489.50.

引用本文的文献

1
A perspective on small molecules targeting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and their utility in cardiovascular diseases: exploring the structural insights for rational drug discovery and development.靶向肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统的小分子及其在心血管疾病中的应用前景:探索合理药物发现与开发的结构见解
RSC Med Chem. 2025 Jan 21. doi: 10.1039/d4md00720d.
2
Are patients in heart failure trials representative of primary care populations? A systematic review.心力衰竭试验中的患者是否代表初级保健人群?一项系统评价。
BJGP Open. 2018 Apr 24;2(1):bjgpopen18X101337. doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen18X101337. eCollection 2018 Apr.
3
Renal artery stenosis as a cause of renal impairment: implications for treatment of hypertension and congestive heart failure.
肾动脉狭窄作为肾功能损害的一个原因:对高血压和充血性心力衰竭治疗的影响。
J R Soc Med. 1999 Oct;92(10):505-10. doi: 10.1177/014107689909201004.