Poca M A, Sahuquillo J, Báguena M, Pedraza S, Gracia R M, Rubio E
Department of Neurosurgery, Vall d'Hebron University Hospitals, Barcelona, Spain.
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 1998;71:27-30. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6475-4_8.
Intracranial hypertension (ICH) is a frequent finding in patients with a severe head injury. High intracranial pressure (ICP) has been associated with certain computerized tomography (CT) abnormalities. The classification proposed by Marshall et al. based on CT scan findings, uses the status of the mesencephalic cisterns, the degree of midline shift, and the presence or absence of focal lesions to categorize the patients into different prognostic groups. Our aim in this study was to analyze the ICP evolution pattern in the different groups of lesions of this classification.
We present the results of a prospective study in 94 patients with severe head injury, in whom ICP was monitored for at least 6 hours. ICP evolution was classified into three different categories: 1) ICP always < 20 mm Hg, 2) Intracranial hypertension at some time during monitoring, but controlled by medical or surgical treatment, 3) Uncontrollable ICP. The ICP pattern was correlated with the final CT diagnostic category.
3 patients had a normal CT scan, and none of them presented intracranial hypertension. In diffuse injury type II, the ICP evolution may be quite different. Patients with bilateral brain swelling (Diffuse Injury III) have a high risk of increased ICP (63.2%). Although in our study the frequency of Diffuse Injury IV was low, all patients in this category had a refractory ICP. In the category of evacuated mass lesions, two thirds of the patients presented an intracranial hypertension. In one third, ICP was refractory to treatment. 85% of patients with a non-evacuated mass lesion showed an increased ICP.
颅内高压(ICH)在重度颅脑损伤患者中很常见。高颅内压(ICP)与某些计算机断层扫描(CT)异常有关。Marshall等人基于CT扫描结果提出的分类方法,利用中脑导水管的状态、中线移位程度以及局灶性病变的有无,将患者分为不同的预后组。本研究的目的是分析该分类中不同病变组的ICP演变模式。
我们展示了一项对94例重度颅脑损伤患者的前瞻性研究结果,这些患者的ICP至少监测了6小时。ICP演变分为三种不同类别:1)ICP始终<20 mmHg,2)监测期间某一时刻出现颅内高压,但通过药物或手术治疗得到控制,3)无法控制的ICP。ICP模式与最终的CT诊断类别相关。
3例患者CT扫描正常,且均未出现颅内高压。在II型弥漫性损伤中,ICP演变可能有很大不同。双侧脑肿胀(弥漫性损伤III型)的患者ICP升高风险高(63.2%)。尽管在我们的研究中IV型弥漫性损伤的发生率较低,但该类别中的所有患者ICP均难以控制。在有占位性病变已清除的类别中,三分之二的患者出现颅内高压。三分之一的患者ICP对治疗无效。85%有占位性病变未清除的患者显示ICP升高。