• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复发时间对参加帕尔马试验的侵袭性淋巴瘤患者具有预后价值。

Time to relapse has prognostic value in patients with aggressive lymphoma enrolled onto the Parma trial.

作者信息

Guglielmi C, Gomez F, Philip T, Hagenbeek A, Martelli M, Sebban C, Milpied N, Bron D, Cahn J Y, Somers R, Sonneveld P, Gisselbrecht C, Van Der Lelie H, Chauvin F

机构信息

Dipartimento di Biotecnologie Cellulari ed Ematologia, Università La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 1998 Oct;16(10):3264-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.10.3264.

DOI:10.1200/JCO.1998.16.10.3264
PMID:9779700
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of time to relapse in 188 adult patients with intermediate- or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) included on the Parma trial at the time of their first relapse.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The median follow-up of these patients is 102 months after registration onto the Parma study. Time to relapse was calculated from initial diagnosis, and a cutoff of 12 months was used to separate 77 patients defined as early relapse from 111 patients defined as late relapse.

RESULTS

Patients with early and late relapses had significantly different overall response rates to salvage therapy with two courses of dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, and cisplatin (DHAP; 40% v 69%; P=.00007) and different 8-year survival rates (13% v 29%; P=.00001). Features at relapse with a negative prognostic value in univariate analysis were higher than normal lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, tumor size greater than 5 cm, Ann Arbor stages III to IV, and Karnofsky score less than 80%. Therefore, multivariate analyses were performed. Time to relapse (P=.001) and LDH levels at relapse (P=.003) had independent prognostic value, whereas tumor size did not reach statistical significance in the logistic model that predicted overall response after two courses of DHAP. The study of prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) confirmed the prognostic value of time to relapse (P < .0001 for OS and P=.005 for PFS) independent of response or treatment after two courses of DHAP.

CONCLUSION

Time to relapse may be used to stratify patients at time of first relapse of intermediate to high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨188例中度或高度非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)成年患者在帕尔马试验首次复发时的复发时间的预后价值。

患者与方法

这些患者在登记参加帕尔马研究后的中位随访时间为102个月。复发时间从初始诊断开始计算,采用12个月的临界值将77例定义为早期复发的患者与111例定义为晚期复发的患者区分开来。

结果

早期和晚期复发患者接受两疗程地塞米松、大剂量阿糖胞苷和顺铂(DHAP)挽救治疗的总缓解率显著不同(40%对69%;P = 0.00007),8年生存率也不同(13%对29%;P = 0.00001)。单因素分析中具有负性预后价值的复发特征包括乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)水平高于正常、肿瘤大小大于5 cm、Ann Arbor分期III至IV期以及卡诺夫斯基评分低于80%。因此,进行了多因素分析。复发时间(P = 0.001)和复发时的LDH水平(P = 0.003)具有独立的预后价值,而在预测两疗程DHAP后的总缓解率的逻辑模型中,肿瘤大小未达到统计学意义。对总生存(OS)和无进展生存(PFS)的预后因素研究证实了复发时间的预后价值(OS为P < 0.0001,PFS为P = 0.005),独立于两疗程DHAP后的缓解或治疗情况。

结论

复发时间可用于对中度至高度非霍奇金淋巴瘤首次复发时的患者进行分层。

相似文献

1
Time to relapse has prognostic value in patients with aggressive lymphoma enrolled onto the Parma trial.复发时间对参加帕尔马试验的侵袭性淋巴瘤患者具有预后价值。
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Oct;16(10):3264-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.10.3264.
2
The International Prognostic Index correlates to survival in patients with aggressive lymphoma in relapse: analysis of the PARMA trial. Parma Group.
Blood. 1998 Nov 15;92(10):3562-8.
3
VACOP-B versus VACOP-B plus autologous bone marrow transplantation for advanced diffuse non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of a prospective randomized trial by the non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Cooperative Study Group.VACOP-B方案与VACOP-B方案联合自体骨髓移植治疗晚期弥漫性非霍奇金淋巴瘤:非霍奇金淋巴瘤协作研究组前瞻性随机试验结果
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Aug;16(8):2796-802. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.8.2796.
4
Autologous bone marrow transplantation as compared with salvage chemotherapy in relapses of chemotherapy-sensitive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.自体骨髓移植与挽救性化疗治疗化疗敏感型非霍奇金淋巴瘤复发的比较。
N Engl J Med. 1995 Dec 7;333(23):1540-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199512073332305.
5
High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous bone marrow transplantation versus dexamethasone, cisplatin, and cytarabine in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with partial response to front-line chemotherapy: a prospective randomized italian multicenter study.高剂量化疗后自体骨髓移植与地塞米松、顺铂和阿糖胞苷用于对一线化疗部分缓解的侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤:一项前瞻性随机意大利多中心研究
J Clin Oncol. 1996 Feb;14(2):534-42. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.2.534.
6
Treatment of relapsed aggressive lymphomas: regimens with and without high-dose therapy and stem cell rescue.复发侵袭性淋巴瘤的治疗:含与不含高剂量治疗及干细胞救援的方案
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2002 May;49 Suppl 1:S13-20. doi: 10.1007/s00280-002-0447-1. Epub 2002 Apr 12.
7
Autologous bone marrow transplantation for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: value of augmented preparative regimens--a Southwest Oncology Group trial.复发或难治性弥漫性侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的自体骨髓移植:强化预处理方案的价值——一项西南肿瘤协作组试验
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jan;16(1):48-55. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.1.48.
8
Comparison of ICE (ifosfamide-carboplatin-etoposide) versus DHAP (cytosine arabinoside-cisplatin-dexamethasone) as salvage chemotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma.异环磷酰胺-卡铂-依托泊苷(ICE)与阿糖胞苷-顺铂-地塞米松(DHAP)作为复发或难治性淋巴瘤患者挽救性化疗的比较
Cancer Invest. 2008 May;26(4):401-6. doi: 10.1080/07357900701788098.
9
Salvage therapy with an outpatient DHAP schedule followed by PBSC transplantation in 79 lymphoma patients: an intention to mobilize and transplant analysis.79例淋巴瘤患者采用门诊DHAP方案挽救治疗后行外周血干细胞移植:动员和移植意向性分析
Eur J Haematol. 2004 Jan;72(1):10-7. doi: 10.1046/j.0902-4441.2004.00171.x.
10
Treatment of relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphomas with dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, and cisplatin before marrow transplantation.在骨髓移植前用地塞米松、大剂量阿糖胞苷和顺铂治疗复发性非霍奇金淋巴瘤。
J Clin Oncol. 1991 Mar;9(3):423-31. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1991.9.3.423.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes and factors influencing survival in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a population-based analysis.弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者的生存结局及影响生存的因素:一项基于人群的分析。
Blood Neoplasia. 2025 May 19;2(3):100117. doi: 10.1016/j.bneo.2025.100117. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Re-examining the role of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in relapsed large B-cell lymphoma in the era of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy.重新审视造血干细胞移植在嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞疗法时代复发性大B细胞淋巴瘤中的作用。
Front Oncol. 2024 Aug 15;14:1397186. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1397186. eCollection 2024.
3
Real life clinical outcomes of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma in the rituximab era: The STRIDER study.
利妥昔单抗时代复发/难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的真实临床结局:STRIDER 研究。
Cancer Med. 2024 Jul;13(14):e7448. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7448.
4
Lymphoma relapse 1 year or later after immunochemotherapy in DLBCL patients: clinical features and outcome.弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者免疫化疗后 1 年或以上发生淋巴瘤复发:临床特征和结局。
Clin Exp Med. 2024 Mar 1;24(1):48. doi: 10.1007/s10238-024-01306-2.
5
Outcomes of older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP: 10-year follow-up of the LNH03-6B trial.利妥昔单抗联合环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱和泼尼松方案治疗弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤老年患者的结局:LNH03-6B 试验 10 年随访结果。
Blood Adv. 2022 Dec 27;6(24):6169-6179. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007609.
6
Immunotherapy for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Current Landscape and Future Directions.弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤的免疫疗法:现状与未来方向
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Nov 20;13(22):5827. doi: 10.3390/cancers13225827.
7
Novel model predicts prognosis for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in first relapse after initial R-CHOP therapy: a single-institution study in China.新型模型预测初始 R-CHOP 治疗后首次复发的弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者的预后:中国单机构研究。
J Int Med Res. 2021 Apr;49(4):3000605211002971. doi: 10.1177/03000605211002971.
8
A risk model for relapsed/refractory aggressive NHL integrating clinical risk factors and pretransplant Deauville score.复发/难治侵袭性 NHL 的风险模型,整合临床风险因素和移植前 Deauville 评分。
Blood Adv. 2020 Nov 24;4(22):5762-5771. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002814.
9
Impact of bone marrow involvement on outcome in relapsed and refractory transplant eligible diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and transformed indolent lymphoma.骨髓累及对复发/难治性适合移植的弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤和惰性淋巴瘤转化患者结局的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 8;15(7):e0235786. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235786. eCollection 2020.
10
Prognostic Nomogram and Predictive Factors in Refractory or Relapsed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patients Failing Front-Line R-CHOP Regimens.一线R-CHOP方案治疗失败的难治性或复发性弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者的预后列线图及预测因素
J Cancer. 2020 Jan 14;11(6):1516-1524. doi: 10.7150/jca.36997. eCollection 2020.