Tateyama T, Hummel T, Roscher S, Post H, Kobal G
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagoshima University, Sakuragaoka, Japan.
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998 Sep;108(5):449-55. doi: 10.1016/s0168-5597(98)00022-7.
The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of odorant concentration on the olfactory event-related potential (OERP).
OERP were evaluated in 8 men and 8 women (17-34 years of age) in response to 4 concentrations of vanillin (7, 28, 56 and 84% v/v). Sixteen presentations of each concentration (stimulus duration 200 ms, interval 40 s, flow 81/min) were applied in a randomized order. EEG recordings were made at 3 midline sites (pos. Fz, Cz, Pz). Amplitudes and latencies of four peaks were measured (latencies in ms at Pz after stimulation with 84% v/v vanillin): P1 (277), N1 (348), P2 (412) and P3 (496). Statistical analysis was performed with MANOVAs ('concentration', 'recording site' = within-subject-factors; 'age' as covariate).
With increasing stimulus concentration amplitudes became significantly larger; this was most pronounced for P3 (P1N1: F = 2.90, P < 0.05; N1P2: F = 5.15, P < 0.01; N1P3: F = 35.7, P < 0.001; P3: F = 38.6; P < 0.001). Correspondingly, latencies shortened with increasing concentrations (P1: F = 25.2; N1: 17.51; P2: 14.8; P3: 13.4; all P < 0.001). While there was no correlation between OERP amplitudes and butanol odor detection thresholds, latencies were the shorter the lower the subjects' thresholds (coefficients of correlations for peak latencies at Cz for 84% v/v: P1 rl5 = -0.59; N1 rl5 = 0.58; P2 r15 = -0.55; P3 r15 = -0.45).
The results indicated that both OERP amplitudes and latencies are related to the concentration of olfactory stimuli. They also suggested that latencies exhibit a stronger relation to changes in stimulus intensity compared to OERP amplitudes.
本研究旨在探讨气味剂浓度对嗅觉事件相关电位(OERP)的影响。
对8名男性和8名女性(年龄17 - 34岁)进行OERP评估,以响应4种浓度的香草醛(7%、28%、56%和84% v/v)。每种浓度进行16次呈现(刺激持续时间200毫秒,间隔40秒,气流81/分钟),呈现顺序随机。在3个中线部位(Fz、Cz、Pz)记录脑电图。测量四个波峰的振幅和潜伏期(用84% v/v香草醛刺激后Pz处的潜伏期,单位为毫秒):P1(277)、N1(348)、P2(412)和P3(496)。采用多因素方差分析进行统计分析(“浓度”、“记录部位”为受试者内因素;“年龄”作为协变量)。
随着刺激浓度增加,振幅显著增大;P3最为明显(P1N1:F = 2.90,P < 0.05;N1P2:F = 5.15,P < 0.01;N1P3:F = 35.7,P < 0.001;P3:F = 38.6;P < 0.001)。相应地,潜伏期随浓度增加而缩短(P1:F = 25.2;N1:17.51;P2:14.8;P3:13.4;均P < 0.001)。虽然OERP振幅与丁醇气味检测阈值之间无相关性,但受试者阈值越低,潜伏期越短(84% v/v时Cz处波峰潜伏期的相关系数:P1 rl = -0.59;N1 rl = 0.58;P2 rl = -0.55;P3 rl = -0.45)。
结果表明,OERP振幅和潜伏期均与嗅觉刺激浓度有关。研究还表明,与OERP振幅相比,潜伏期与刺激强度变化的关系更强。