• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定成品托盘和定制托盘印模/模型的准确性。

Determining the accuracy of stock and custom tray impression/casts.

作者信息

Millstein P, Maya A, Segura C

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Medicine, Tufts Univerity, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Oral Rehabil. 1998 Aug;25(8):645-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00306.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00306.x
PMID:9781870
Abstract

A study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of casts made from stock tray and custom tray impressions using polysiloxane impression material. The results indicate that all casts distort but that impressions made from custom trays were more accurate and consistent in reproduction than were stock tray impressions.

摘要

进行了一项研究,以评估使用聚硅氧烷印模材料从成品托盘和定制托盘印模制作的模型的准确性。结果表明,所有模型都会变形,但定制托盘制作的印模在复制方面比成品托盘印模更准确、更一致。

相似文献

1
Determining the accuracy of stock and custom tray impression/casts.确定成品托盘和定制托盘印模/模型的准确性。
J Oral Rehabil. 1998 Aug;25(8):645-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00306.x.
2
Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.开放式托盘种植体印模的准确性:成品托盘与定制托盘的体外比较
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Mar;89(3):250-5. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2003.38.
3
The influence of tray space and repeat pours on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impression.托盘空间和重复灌注对单相聚硅氧烷印模准确性的影响。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012 Nov 1;13(6):824-9. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1236.
4
Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.牙模的尺寸精度:托盘材料、印模材料和时间的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2002 Jun;11(2):98-108.
5
Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.单相、一步法和两步法以及一种新型两步法油泥/轻体印模技术制作的最终模型的尺寸精度:一项体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Apr;99(4):274-81. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60061-X.
6
Effect of impression tray design and impression technique upon the accuracy of stone casts produced from a putty-wash polyvinyl siloxane impression material.印模托盘设计和印模技术对由糊剂-冲洗型聚乙烯基硅氧烷印模材料制作的石膏模型准确性的影响。
J Dent. 1991 Oct;19(5):283-9. doi: 10.1016/0300-5712(91)90072-7.
7
Effect of tray space on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impressions.托盘间距对单相聚乙烯基硅氧烷印模准确性的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 1992 Jul;68(1):19-28. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90278-i.
8
The accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions made with standard and reinforced stock trays.使用标准型和加强型成品托盘制作的聚乙烯基硅氧烷印模的准确性。
J Prosthet Dent. 1991 Jun;65(6):748-57. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(05)80006-x.
9
The effect of using custom or stock trays on the accuracy of gypsum casts.
Int J Prosthodont. 1996 Jul-Aug;9(4):367-73.
10
The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts.定制托盘材料对工作模型精度的影响。
J Prosthodont. 1998 Jun;7(2):106-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849x.1998.tb00188.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Custom double tray for a special impression technique for flabby maxillary residual ridge: Case report.用于松软上颌剩余牙槽嵴的特殊印模技术的定制双托盘:病例报告
Clin Case Rep. 2022 Mar 17;10(3):e05593. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.5593. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
Comparison of the surface roughness of gypsum models constructed using various impression materials and gypsum products.使用各种印模材料和石膏产品制作的石膏模型表面粗糙度的比较。
J Dent Sci. 2016 Mar;11(1):23-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2012.11.002. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
3
A simple technique for impression taking of teeth and functionally generated paths.
一种用于获取牙齿印模和功能生成路径的简单技术。
Restor Dent Endod. 2018 Feb 3;43(1):e9. doi: 10.5395/rde.2018.43.e9. eCollection 2018 Feb.
4
In Vitro Comparative Evaluation of Different Types of Impression Trays and Impression Materials on the Accuracy of Open Tray Implant Impressions: A Pilot Study.不同类型印模托盘和印模材料对开放式种植体印模准确性的体外比较评估:一项初步研究。
Int J Dent. 2017;2017:6306530. doi: 10.1155/2017/6306530. Epub 2017 Feb 27.