Lagueny A, Arnaud A, Le Masson G, Burbaud P, Deliac P, Marthan R
Department of Neurology, Hopital du Haut leveque, Pessac.
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998 Sep;38(6):333-42.
Involvement of the diaphragm was evaluated electrophysiologically in 22 patients with definite multiple sclerosis. Magnetic transcranial stimulation (MTS), magnetic cervical stimulation at C4 level (MCS) and electric stimulation of the phrenic nerve at the neck (EPS) were performed for measuring latencies, motor conduction times and amplitudes of the responses recorded with a pair of surface or subcutaneous electrodes located at the xiphoid and the 8th costal interspace on the anterior axillary line. Latency of the motor evoked potentials (MEPs) was abnormal: in 9 patients following MTS, in 6 following MCS, in 2 following EPS. The motor conduction time between the cortex and the cervical spine, we called CMCT1, was abnormal in 11 patients and the motor conduction time between the cortex and the neck, we called CMCT2, was abnormal in 8 patients. However CMCT1 was more often unmeasurable than CMCT2 because the MEPs following MCS were unreliable in 4 patients. The conduction time between the cervical spine and the neck was abnormally long in 2 patients but it was paradoxically abnormally short in 3, probably because of the difficulties in locating exactly the place of the stimulation at the cervical C4 level. The MEP amplitude was not considered a reliable parameter because of the large range of the values in our controls, although the mean amplitude was significantly lower in the patients than in the controls. The amplitude of the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) following EPS was below the lower limit of the normal in 9 patients. The percentage of abnormal MEP latencies and CMCTs when both sides were combined was higher for the hemidiaphragms than for the upper limbs and was roughly the same for the hemidiaphragms and the lower limbs. Moreover electrophysiological study of the diaphragm was abnormal in 5 patients without pulmonary symptoms and with normal pulmonary function tests, demonstrating that this study is useful for revealing infraclinical demyelinating lesions on the central motor pathways down to diaphragm. In addition, alterations of the CMAPs in some patients suggest a possible extension of the lesions towards the anterior horns and anterior roots.
对22例确诊为多发性硬化症的患者进行了膈肌受累的电生理评估。采用磁刺激运动诱发电位(MTS)、C4水平磁刺激颈髓(MCS)和颈部膈神经电刺激(EPS),用位于剑突和腋前线第8肋间隙的一对表面或皮下电极记录反应的潜伏期、运动传导时间和波幅。运动诱发电位(MEP)潜伏期异常:MTS后9例,MCS后6例,EPS后2例。皮层与颈椎之间的运动传导时间(我们称为CMCT1)在11例患者中异常,皮层与颈部之间的运动传导时间(我们称为CMCT2)在8例患者中异常。然而,CMCT1比CMCT2更常无法测量,因为4例患者MCS后的MEP不可靠。颈椎与颈部之间的传导时间在2例患者中异常延长,但在3例患者中却异常缩短,这可能是因为在颈部C4水平精确确定刺激部位存在困难。由于我们对照组中MEP波幅的值范围较大,因此MEP波幅不被视为可靠参数,尽管患者的平均波幅明显低于对照组。EPS后复合肌肉动作电位(CMAP)波幅在9例患者中低于正常下限。双侧合并时,半膈肌异常MEP潜伏期和CMCTs的百分比高于上肢,与下肢大致相同。此外,5例无肺部症状且肺功能测试正常的患者膈肌电生理研究异常,表明该研究有助于揭示直至膈肌的中枢运动通路亚临床脱髓鞘病变。此外,一些患者CMAP的改变提示病变可能向前角和前根扩展。