Belcaro G, Nicolaides A N, Marlinghaus E H, Cesarone M R, Incandela L, De Sanctis M T, Dhanjil S, Laurora G, Ramaswami G, Artese L, Ferrero G, Ricci A, Barsotti A, Ledda A, Steigerwalt R, Griffin M
Angiology Department, Pierangeli Clinic, Pescara, Italy.
Angiology. 1998 Oct;49(10):777-88. doi: 10.1177/000331979804900901.
Three human aortic specimens were used for this in-vitro study on the effects of shock waves on the arterial wall. Specimen one was from a normal (for age) healthy aorta. The full abdominal length was used (including mesenteric and renal arteries and the aortoiliac bifurcation), divided into six pieces (3 cm). The pieces were placed and fixed into degassed water. Shock waves (SW) were focused onto the aortic wall by means of a B-mode ultrasound imager. An SW generator (Minilith SL1, Storz Medical AG, Kreuzlingen, Switzerland) was used for setting of energy flux density between 0.03 and 0.5 mJ/mm2. The six aortic pieces (excluding piece 1, placed in water and left untreated as control) were treated with SW at increasing energy levels. A second aortic specimen of a man with arteriosclerotic plaques was also used and the experiment repeated at energy levels 1, 5, and 8. Another specimen of normal thoracic aorta was exposed at energy levels 1 and 8 only. Energy levels delivered onto the aortic walls were selected from theoretically destructive levels to minimal levels known not to alter vascular tissues. High-resolution ultrasounds of the aortic segments were performed with a 10 MHz high-resolution, broad-band (ATL 3000, USA) probe in water before and after SW application to detect structural changes in the wall after SW. Histology was performed with a standard hematoxylin-eosin staining.
The aortic pieces did not show macroscopic damages at visual examination, and at the ultrasound examination no visible changes were observed even at higher levels of SW energy. Also no effects were seen by histology. In conclusion, no damaging effects were observed, visually, by ultrasound, or by histology. At these energy levels SW appear to be safe and do not produce any damage to the aortic wall. Therefore, SW could be considered a safe, nondamaging procedure for potential treatment (ie, thrombolysis) in which vessel walls could be involved. Theoretically it is possible that functional changes could be observed in vivo including cell permeability modifications and other alterations (including changes in the potential of the cells in SW fields to modify themselves and to divide). At the energy levels described in this study SW could, theoretically be, safely used for vascular applications (ie, treating venous and arterial thrombi or in arterial plaques modification) without altering major, structural, arterial wall characteristics. Lesions or alterations that have a different density from the normal wall (thrombi or plaques) could be differently sensitive to the same dosage of SW. These differences in acoustic impedance characteristics could be used for potential treatments with SW without damaging the arterial wall.
本体外研究使用了三个人类主动脉标本,以研究冲击波对动脉壁的影响。标本一取自年龄正常的健康主动脉。使用了整个腹部长度(包括肠系膜动脉、肾动脉和主动脉髂动脉分叉处),将其分成六块(3厘米)。将这些小块放置并固定在脱气水中。借助B型超声成像仪将冲击波聚焦到主动脉壁上。使用冲击波发生器(Minilith SL1,瑞士克鲁兹林根的施乐辉医疗公司)将能量通量密度设置在0.03至0.5 mJ/mm²之间。对六块主动脉小块(不包括第1块,其置于水中未作处理作为对照)用逐渐增加的能量水平的冲击波进行处理。还使用了一名患有动脉粥样硬化斑块男性的第二个主动脉标本,并在能量水平1、5和8重复该实验。另一个正常胸主动脉标本仅在能量水平1和8进行处理。施加到主动脉壁上的能量水平从理论上的破坏水平到已知不会改变血管组织的最小水平中选择。在施加冲击波前后,使用10 MHz高分辨率宽带探头(美国ATL 3000)在水中对主动脉段进行高分辨率超声检查,以检测冲击波作用后血管壁的结构变化。组织学检查采用标准苏木精-伊红染色。
在肉眼检查中,主动脉小块未显示宏观损伤,在超声检查中,即使在较高的冲击波能量水平下也未观察到明显变化。组织学检查也未发现任何影响。总之,在肉眼、超声或组织学检查中均未观察到损伤作用。在这些能量水平下,冲击波似乎是安全的,不会对主动脉壁造成任何损伤。因此,对于可能涉及血管壁的潜在治疗(即溶栓),冲击波可被视为一种安全、无损伤的方法。理论上,在体内可能观察到功能变化,包括细胞通透性改变和其他改变(包括在冲击波场中细胞自我修饰和分裂的潜能变化)。在本研究中描述的能量水平下,理论上冲击波可安全用于血管应用(即治疗静脉和动脉血栓或改变动脉斑块),而不会改变主动脉壁的主要结构特征。与正常壁密度不同的病变或改变(血栓或斑块)可能对相同剂量的冲击波有不同的敏感性。这些声阻抗特性的差异可用于冲击波的潜在治疗,而不会损伤动脉壁。