Suppr超能文献

毒性研究中扩展的临床观察:历史视角与当代问题

Expanded clinical observations in toxicity studies: historical perspectives and contemporary issues.

作者信息

Ross J F, Mattsson J L, Fix A S

机构信息

Human and Environmental Safety Division, The Procter and Gamble Company, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45239-8707, USA.

出版信息

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1998 Aug;28(1):17-26. doi: 10.1006/rtph.1998.1228.

Abstract

Recent or proposed changes in major testing guidelines require expanded clinical observations (ECOs) for a wide variety of toxicity studies in animals. ECOs supplement the simple cageside and hand-held observations traditionally employed during such studies. The new guidelines specify out-of-cage observations [e.g., posture, gait, and reactivity to various stimuli (e.g., auditory, tactile, noxious)] using defined scales and are intended as a Tier 1 screen for neurotoxicity. These new guidelines imply an elevation in the status of clinical observations to equivalency with other major categories of toxicity end points, such as anatomic and clinical pathology. The increased importance of neurological end points in routine studies indicates that there will be a need for many trained professionals to generate and interpret the results of ECOs. However, currently there is wide variation in the training and experience of individuals who conduct and interpret ECOs. The value of ECO data will be increased when industry standards for conducting and interpreting ECOs are systematized and elevated to the level of those for anatomic and clinical pathology.

摘要

主要测试指南最近的变化或提议的变化要求在各种动物毒性研究中进行扩展临床观察(ECO)。ECO补充了此类研究中传统采用的简单笼边观察和手持观察。新指南规定了使用特定量表进行笼外观察[例如姿势、步态以及对各种刺激(如听觉、触觉、有害刺激)的反应性],并旨在作为神经毒性的一级筛查。这些新指南意味着临床观察的地位得到提升,与解剖学和临床病理学等其他主要毒性终点类别相当。常规研究中神经学终点重要性的增加表明,将需要许多训练有素的专业人员来生成和解释ECO的结果。然而,目前进行和解释ECO的人员在培训和经验方面存在很大差异。当进行和解释ECO的行业标准系统化并提升到解剖学和临床病理学的标准水平时,ECO数据的价值将得到提高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验