• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于重建肘部尺侧副韧带的微创技术的生物力学

Biomechanics of a less invasive procedure for reconstruction of the ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow.

作者信息

Hechtman K S, Tjin-A-Tsoi E W, Zvijac J E, Uribe J W, Latta L L

机构信息

University of Miami, School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Coral Gables, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 1998 Sep-Oct;26(5):620-4. doi: 10.1177/03635465980260050401.

DOI:10.1177/03635465980260050401
PMID:9784806
Abstract

A reconstruction of the anterior bundle of the ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow using bone anchors was compared regarding strain and valgus load strength with the intact ulnar collateral ligament and the reconstructed ulnar collateral ligament using bone tunnels. In both normal and reconstructed elbows, the anterior band and posterior band were tight during only a portion of the range of motion. Toward extension, the mean peak strain in the anterior band was tight for the normal and bone anchor groups, but lax in the bone tunnel group. Toward extension, the mean peak strain in the posterior band was lax in all elbows. Toward flexion, the strain in the anterior band was lax in the normal and bone anchor groups, but tight in the bone tunnel group. The mean of the peak strains for the posterior band toward flexion was tight for all elbows. Mean valgus load strength of normal elbows was 22.7 +/- 9.0 N.m. The bone tunnel and bone anchor mean strengths were 76.3% and 63.5%, respectively, of normal elbow strength. We concluded that the bone anchor reproduced the normal anatomy and mechanical function of the ulnar collateral ligament more closely than the bone tunnel, and that both reconstruction methods were significantly weaker than the normal ulnar collateral ligament. However, we found no significant difference in reconstruction strength between bone anchor and bone tunnel.

摘要

采用骨锚重建肘关节尺侧副韧带前束,并将其与完整尺侧副韧带以及采用骨隧道重建的尺侧副韧带在应变和外翻负荷强度方面进行比较。在正常肘关节和重建肘关节中,前束和后束仅在部分运动范围内处于紧张状态。在伸展过程中,正常组和骨锚组前束的平均峰值应变处于紧张状态,而骨隧道组则松弛。在伸展过程中,所有肘关节后束的平均峰值应变均松弛。在屈曲过程中,正常组和骨锚组前束的应变松弛,而骨隧道组则紧张。所有肘关节后束在屈曲时的峰值应变平均值均紧张。正常肘关节的平均外翻负荷强度为22.7±9.0N·m。骨隧道和骨锚的平均强度分别为正常肘关节强度的76.3%和63.5%。我们得出结论,与骨隧道相比,骨锚能更接近地重现尺侧副韧带的正常解剖结构和力学功能,并且两种重建方法均明显弱于正常尺侧副韧带。然而,我们发现骨锚和骨隧道在重建强度上无显著差异。

相似文献

1
Biomechanics of a less invasive procedure for reconstruction of the ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow.一种用于重建肘部尺侧副韧带的微创技术的生物力学
Am J Sports Med. 1998 Sep-Oct;26(5):620-4. doi: 10.1177/03635465980260050401.
2
Revision ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction using a suspension button fixation technique.采用悬吊纽扣固定技术进行桡侧副韧带重建。
Am J Sports Med. 2010 Mar;38(3):575-80. doi: 10.1177/0363546509350109. Epub 2009 Dec 22.
3
Anatomic and Biomechanical Evaluation of Ulnar Tunnel Position in Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction.尺侧副韧带重建术中尺神经隧道位置的解剖与生物力学评估。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Dec;47(14):3491-3497. doi: 10.1177/0363546519880182. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
4
Comparison of the biomechanical profile of the intact ulnar collateral ligament with the modified Jobe and the Docking reconstructed elbow: an in vitro study.完整尺侧副韧带与改良乔布法和对接重建肘关节生物力学特征的比较:一项体外研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2009 May;37(5):974-81. doi: 10.1177/0363546508331136. Epub 2009 Mar 6.
5
Biomechanical evaluation of a new reconstruction technique of the ulnar collateral ligament in the elbow with modified bone tunnel placement and interference screw fixation.采用改良骨隧道置入及挤压螺钉固定技术对肘部尺侧副韧带进行新型重建的生物力学评估。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2010 Jan;25(1):37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.09.005.
6
Defining safe rehabilitation for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow: a biomechanical study.定义肘部尺侧副韧带重建的安全康复:一项生物力学研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2009 Dec;37(12):2392-400. doi: 10.1177/0363546509340658. Epub 2009 Aug 14.
7
Biomechanical Comparison of Anatomic Restoration of the Ulnar Footprint vs Traditional Ulnar Tunnels in Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction.解剖修复尺侧附韧带重建中尺侧足迹与传统尺侧隧道的生物力学比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Apr;50(5):1375-1381. doi: 10.1177/03635465211054475. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
8
Isometric placement of lateral ulnar collateral ligament reconstructions: a biomechanical study.外侧尺侧副韧带重建的等距放置:一项生物力学研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2010 Jan;38(1):153-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546509346049. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
9
A biomechanical evaluation of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction using a novel technique for ulnar-sided fixation.使用一种用于尺侧固定的新技术对尺侧副韧带重建进行生物力学评估。
Am J Sports Med. 2010 Jul;38(7):1448-55. doi: 10.1177/0363546510363463. Epub 2010 May 4.
10
A biomechanical comparison of 2 hybrid techniques for elbow ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction.两种用于肘关节尺侧副韧带重建的混合技术的生物力学比较。
J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Oct;39(10):2033-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.07.040. Epub 2014 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Is Ulnar Collateral Ligament Strength Proportional to Height and Weight?尺侧副韧带强度与身高和体重成正比吗?
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Feb 6;13(2):23259671241312211. doi: 10.1177/23259671241312211. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Twisting technique for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow: new possibilities toward enhancing the strength of autografts.用于肘部尺侧副韧带重建的扭转技术:增强自体移植物强度的新可能性。
JSES Int. 2024 Jan 17;8(3):614-619. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.12.003. eCollection 2024 May.
3
Biomechanical Comparison of Stability and Strength After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With Suture Anchor Fixation Versus Bone Tunnels.
尺侧副韧带重建中使用缝线锚钉固定与骨隧道固定后的稳定性和强度的生物力学比较
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Sep 8;11(9):23259671231196135. doi: 10.1177/23259671231196135. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
Ulnar Collateral Ligament (UCL) Reconstruction With Proximal Single-Tunnel Suspensory Fixation.采用近端单隧道悬吊固定法重建尺侧副韧带
Arthrosc Tech. 2023 May 29;12(6):e997-e1002. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2023.02.038. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
Biomechanical comparison of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction with single-tunnel proximal suspensory fixation versus modified docking technique.单隧道近端悬吊固定与改良对接技术在尺侧副韧带重建中的生物力学比较
JSES Int. 2022 Dec 23;7(2):364-369. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.12.012. eCollection 2023 Mar.
6
Biomechanical Evaluation of a Low-Invasive Elbow Medial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Technique With Fascia and Tendon Patches.一种采用筋膜和肌腱补片的低创性肘关节内侧副韧带重建技术的生物力学评估
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Mar 22;10:831545. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.831545. eCollection 2022.
7
Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With the Modified Jobe Technique in Baseball Pitchers.棒球投手改良Jobe技术的尺侧副韧带重建术
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Apr 27;9(4):2325967121998339. doi: 10.1177/2325967121998339. eCollection 2021 Apr.
8
Short-Term Trends in Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Surgery in Collegiate Baseball Players: An Analysis of 25,587 Player-Years.大学棒球运动员肘部尺侧副韧带手术的短期趋势:对25587运动员年的分析
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Jul 29;9(7):23259671211016846. doi: 10.1177/23259671211016846. eCollection 2021 Jul.
9
The ulnar collateral ligament loading paradox between in-vitro and in-vivo studies on baseball pitching (narrative review).棒球投球中外肘韧帯加载悖论的体外与体内研究(叙述性综述)。
Int Biomech. 2021 Dec;8(1):19-29. doi: 10.1080/23335432.2021.1916405.
10
The History and Evolution of Elbow Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction: from Tommy John to 2020.肘部内侧尺侧副韧带重建的历史与演变:从汤米·约翰手术到2020年
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2020 Jun;13(3):349-360. doi: 10.1007/s12178-020-09618-y.