Lum G
Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Science, Brockton/West Roxbury Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Boston, MA 02132, USA.
Ann Clin Lab Sci. 1998 Sep-Oct;28(5):261-71.
The concept of critical limits (alert values), defined as an imminent life threatening laboratory result requiring immediate physician notification, has been widely adopted as a standard of good laboratory practice. Although virtually all laboratories have tests with critical limits, surveys have shown that there is no universal alert value list. Recently, nine VA medical centers in the New England region, which now constitute one consolidated entity, were surveyed with the objective of summarizing critical limits. Universal (100 percent) critical limit tests for clinical chemistry were: Calcium; mean low/high, 6.5/12.4 mg/dL: Glucose 48/432 mg/dL: Potassium 2.8/6.1 mmol/L: Sodium 121/159 mmol/L. Universal hematology tests included: Hematocrit 22.2/59.7 percent: Platelet count 61K/983K: white blood count 1.9K/29K. Although there was universal agreement that abnormal coagulation tests (PT, PTT) should be included on the hematology critical limit list, there was wide variation in the reporting of coagulation tests (seconds and INR) and patient therapeutic status (anticoagulant or no-anticoagulant). Universal alert values for microbiology were: Positive blood culture: Positive cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) culture: Positive CSF Gram stain. There was no universal agreement regarding critically high (potentially toxic) therapeutic drugs, with two medical centers declining to notify physicians of any abnormally high therapeutic drug level. No other qualitative critical limits for other laboratory sections, such as physician notification of an unexpected malignancy (surgical pathology) were universal. Medical center specific critical limits, designed to meet the clinical needs of each facility, are the norm in the nine medical centers. Laboratories do need periodically to review their critical limit lists with appropriate clinical input to avoid including critical limits for laboratory tests not required for urgent physician notification and patient evaluation and treatment.
危急值(警示值)的概念被广泛用作良好实验室操作规范的标准,它被定义为一种即将危及生命的实验室结果,需要立即通知医生。尽管几乎所有实验室都设有危急值的检测项目,但调查显示并没有通用的警示值清单。最近,对新英格兰地区现合并为一个实体的九家退伍军人医疗中心进行了调查,目的是汇总危急值。临床化学的通用(100%)危急值检测项目为:钙,均值低/高,6.5/12.4mg/dL;葡萄糖,48/432mg/dL;钾,2.8/6.1mmol/L;钠,121/159mmol/L。通用的血液学检测项目包括:血细胞比容,22.2/59.7%;血小板计数,61K/983K;白细胞计数,1.9K/29K。尽管大家普遍认为异常凝血检测(PT、PTT)应列入血液学危急值清单,但凝血检测结果(秒数和国际标准化比值)以及患者治疗状态(抗凝或非抗凝)的报告存在很大差异。微生物学的通用警示值为:血培养阳性;脑脊液(CSF)培养阳性;脑脊液革兰氏染色阳性。对于治疗药物严重偏高(可能有毒性)的情况,并没有达成普遍共识,有两家医疗中心拒绝向医生通报任何治疗药物水平异常升高的情况。其他实验室部门,如医生通报意外恶性肿瘤(外科病理学)的其他定性危急值并不通用。为满足各机构临床需求而制定的各医疗中心特定危急值在这九家医疗中心是常态。实验室确实需要定期根据适当的临床意见审查其危急值清单,以避免将那些并非紧急通知医生及患者评估和治疗所需的实验室检测项目列入危急值。