• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

上消化道内镜检查:准备性干预措施是否有效?

Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: are preparatory interventions effective?

作者信息

Hackett M L, Lane M R, McCarthy D C

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Auckland Hospital, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 1998 Oct;48(4):341-7. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70001-x.

DOI:10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70001-x
PMID:9786104
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to examine the effects of preparatory cognitive and behavioral information on self-confidence, anxiety, and negative affect elicited by an impending upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

METHODS

Forty-eight male and female out-patients, between 18 and 65 years of age, scheduled for a first-time, non-emergency, endoscopic examination were randomly assigned to receive one of four experimental interventions: cognitive, behavioral, combination, or attention-control. Measures of self-reported anxiety and self-reported self-confidence were obtained.

RESULTS

Cognitive and combination intervention subjects were statistically younger than behavioral and attention-control subjects. A credibility assessment revealed that subjects who were taught visualization used it during their procedure. Results indicated that subjects in the cognitive and combination interventions experienced significant reduction in anxiety and increase in self-confidence from pre- to post-intervention. Self-confidence did not increase for subjects receiving the behavioral-only or the attention-control interventions.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study show that preparatory information in general is effective in reducing anxiety and in increasing self-confidence before an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Results suggest that teaching subjects visualization before a procedure increases their use of visualization during a procedure.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨术前认知和行为信息对即将进行的上消化道内镜检查所引发的自信、焦虑及负面影响的作用。

方法

将48名年龄在18至65岁之间、计划进行首次非急诊内镜检查的门诊男女患者随机分为四组,分别接受以下四种实验性干预措施之一:认知干预、行为干预、联合干预或注意力控制干预。采用自我报告焦虑和自我报告自信的测量方法。

结果

认知干预组和联合干预组的受试者在统计学上比行为干预组和注意力控制组的受试者更年轻。一项可信度评估显示,接受可视化训练的受试者在检查过程中使用了该方法。结果表明,认知干预组和联合干预组的受试者在干预前后焦虑显著降低,自信显著增强。仅接受行为干预或注意力控制干预的受试者自信并未增加。

结论

本研究结果表明,一般而言,术前信息在减轻上消化道内镜检查前的焦虑和增强自信方面是有效的。结果表明,在检查前教导受试者进行可视化训练可增加他们在检查过程中对可视化方法的使用。

相似文献

1
Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: are preparatory interventions effective?上消化道内镜检查:准备性干预措施是否有效?
Gastrointest Endosc. 1998 Oct;48(4):341-7. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70001-x.
2
The effect of information and behavioural training on endoscopy patients' clinical outcomes.信息与行为训练对内镜检查患者临床结局的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Jul;54(1):61-5. doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00195-2.
3
Preparation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: opportunity or inconvenience?上消化道内镜检查的准备:是机会还是不便?
Gastrointest Endosc. 1998 Oct;48(4):430-2. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70020-3.
4
Undergoing cardiac catheterization: the effects of informational preparation and coping style on patient anxiety during the procedure.接受心导管插入术:信息准备和应对方式对手术过程中患者焦虑的影响。
Heart Lung. 1994 Mar-Apr;23(2):140-50.
5
Effect of systematic psychological preparation using visual illustration prior to gastrointestinal endoscopy on the anxiety of both pediatric patients and parents.胃肠道内镜检查前使用视觉插图进行系统心理准备对儿科患者及其家长焦虑情绪的影响。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2006 Feb;89(2):231-5.
6
Effects of visual aid on state anxiety, fear and stress level in patients undergoing endoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.视觉辅助对接受内镜检查患者的状态焦虑、恐惧和应激水平的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Med. 2023 Dec;55(1):1234-1243. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2191000.
7
Preparing adult patients for cardiac catheterization: informational treatment and coping style interactions.为成年心脏导管插入术患者做准备:信息治疗与应对方式的相互作用
Heart Lung. 1994 Mar-Apr;23(2):130-9.
8
Psychologic preparation for cardiac catheterization.心脏导管插入术的心理准备
Heart Lung. 1989 Mar;18(2):154-63.
9
The Effect of Preparatory Education Program on Discomfort and Retching of Examinees during Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.预备教育计划对上消化道内镜检查期间受检者不适及干呕的影响。
Korean J Fam Med. 2012 Jul;33(4):219-28. doi: 10.4082/kjfm.2012.33.4.219. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
10
Effect of providing information to the patient about upper gastrointestinal endoscopy on the patient's perception, compliance and anxiety level associated with the procedure.向患者提供有关上消化道内镜检查的信息对患者与该检查相关的认知、依从性及焦虑水平的影响。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2011 Feb;22(1):10-7. doi: 10.4318/tjg.2011.0150.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of pre-procedural anxiety level on the quality of upper GI endoscopy in non-sedated patients: "can the need for sedation be predicted?".术前焦虑水平对非镇静患者上消化道内镜检查质量的影响:“能否预测镇静需求?”
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 16;18:17562848251333025. doi: 10.1177/17562848251333025. eCollection 2025.
2
The Effect of Preparatory Education Program on Discomfort and Retching of Examinees during Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.预备教育计划对上消化道内镜检查期间受检者不适及干呕的影响。
Korean J Fam Med. 2012 Jul;33(4):219-28. doi: 10.4082/kjfm.2012.33.4.219. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
3
Canadian Association of Gastroenterology consensus guidelines on safety and quality indicators in endoscopy.
加拿大胃肠病学协会关于内镜检查安全性和质量指标的共识指南
Can J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jan;26(1):17-31. doi: 10.1155/2012/173739.
4
Panic Attack during Elective Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.择期胃肠内镜检查时发生惊恐发作。
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2011;2011:162574. doi: 10.1155/2011/162574. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
5
Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: are preparatory interventions or conscious sedation effective? A randomized trial.上消化道内镜检查:准备性干预措施或清醒镇静有效吗?一项随机试验。
World J Gastroenterol. 2004 Nov 15;10(22):3313-7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i22.3313.
6
Unsedated transnasal endoscopy: a safe and less costly alternative.非镇静经鼻内镜检查:一种安全且成本较低的替代方法。
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2002 Jun;4(3):213-7. doi: 10.1007/s11894-002-0065-4.