Sato D T, Goff C D, Gregory R T, Robinson K D, Carter K A, Herts B R, Vilsack H B, Gayle R G, Parent F N, DeMasi R J, Meier G H
Division of Vascular Surgery, Eastern Virginia Medical School, and the Core Laboratory for the Endovascular Aneurysm Clinical Trial, Norfolk 23510, USA.
J Vasc Surg. 1998 Oct;28(4):657-63. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(98)70091-6.
The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of a color duplex ultrasound scan (CDU) to a computerized axial tomography scan (CT) in the diagnosis of endoleaks after stent graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
The Endovascular Aneurysm Clinical Trial Core Laboratory records were reviewed from 117 concurrent CDU and CT studies that were performed in 79 patients who were implanted with the Endovascular Technologies stent graft device between December 1995 and January 1997. All of the studies were interpreted by the Core Laboratory as having the presence or the absence of an endoleak or as being indeterminate because of technical factors. Of the 117 videotaped CDU studies available for reexamination, 100 were reassessed for technical adequacy on the basis of the following criteria: a satisfactory imaging of the aneurysm sac and of the stent graft with gray scale, and both color and spectral Doppler scan evaluation for endoleak outside the endograft and within the aneurysm sac.
Of the 117 studies, 103 CDUs (88%) and 114 CTs (97%) were recorded as having the presence or the absence of an endoleak and 14 CDUs (12%) and 3 CTs (3%) were indeterminate. For the studies that were recorded to have the presence or the absence of an endoleak, the sensitivity, the specificity, the positive and the negative predictive values, and the accuracy of CDUs as compared with CTs were 97%, 74%, 66%, 98%, and 82%, respectively. Of the 100 CDU videotaped studies available for review, the following results were seen: (1) 93 CDUs had satisfactory B-mode images, (2) 76 had satisfactory color Doppler scan images to evaluate for endoleaks, (3) 55 had color Doppler scan assessment of the entire abdominal aortic aneurysm sac for endoleak, and (4) 27 had spectral Doppler scan waveform confirmation of suspected endoleaks. Only 19 CDU studies (19%) with all 4 criteria for complete assessment of endoleak were performed.
Although most of the CDU studies were technically suboptimal, the CDUs reliably identified endoleaks with an excellent sensitivity and a negative predictive value as compared with CT scans.
本研究旨在比较彩色双功超声扫描(CDU)与计算机断层扫描(CT)在腹主动脉瘤支架植入修复术后内漏诊断中的准确性。
回顾了血管内动脉瘤临床试验核心实验室的记录,这些记录来自1995年12月至1997年1月期间对79例植入血管内技术支架移植物装置的患者进行的117项同步CDU和CT研究。所有研究均由核心实验室解读为存在或不存在内漏,或因技术因素而不确定。在可供重新检查的117项录像CDU研究中,根据以下标准对100项进行了技术充分性重新评估:动脉瘤囊和支架移植物的灰阶成像满意,以及对移植物外和动脉瘤囊内的内漏进行彩色和频谱多普勒扫描评估。
在117项研究中,103项CDU(88%)和114项CT(97%)记录为存在或不存在内漏,14项CDU(12%)和3项CT(3%)不确定。对于记录为存在或不存在内漏的研究,与CT相比,CDU的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值以及准确性分别为97%、74%、66%、98%和82%。在可供审查的100项录像CDU研究中,观察到以下结果:(1)93项CDU有满意的B模式图像,(2)76项有满意的彩色多普勒扫描图像用于评估内漏,(3)55项对整个腹主动脉瘤囊进行了彩色多普勒扫描评估内漏,(4)27项通过频谱多普勒扫描波形证实了疑似内漏。只有19项CDU研究(19%)满足所有4项内漏完全评估标准。
尽管大多数CDU研究在技术上并不理想,但与CT扫描相比,CDU能可靠地识别内漏,具有出色的敏感性和阴性预测值。