便携式荧光透视X射线系统与传统固定血管造影系统：冠状动脉狭窄检测的比较
Portable fluoroscopic X-ray systems and traditional fixed angiographic systems: a comparison in the detection of coronary stenosis.
作者信息
Carosio G, Taverna G, Ballestrero G, Reale M, Molendi V
机构信息
Laboratorio di Emodinamica, Azienda Ospedaliera SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria.
出版信息
G Ital Cardiol. 1998 Sep;28(9):979-83.
INTRODUCTION
The ability to perform coronary angiography at the bedside has multiple applications.
METHODS
In this study, we compare the images obtained in 100 patients undergoing elective coronary angiography for coronary heart disease, with a portable X-ray imaging system (OEC 9600 Cardiac Version) to those obtained with a traditional fixed system (Siemens Coroskop C).
RESULTS
A complete concordance between the systems for lesion location, stenosis quantification, morphologic characterization, TI-MI flow and collaterals was found.
CONCLUSIONS
These findings demonstrate that a portable imaging system can produce high-quality images. The feasibility of performing a complete diagnostic procedure and the routine use of the system require more specific evaluation.
引言
床边进行冠状动脉造影的能力有多种应用。
方法
在本研究中，我们将100例因冠心病接受择期冠状动脉造影的患者使用便携式X射线成像系统（OEC 9600心脏版）获得的图像与使用传统固定系统（西门子Coroskop C）获得的图像进行比较。
结果
发现两个系统在病变定位、狭窄定量、形态学特征、心肌梗死溶栓治疗（TIMI）血流和侧支循环方面完全一致。
结论
这些发现表明便携式成像系统可产生高质量图像。进行完整诊断程序的可行性以及该系统的常规使用需要更具体的评估。
Zotero 插件