• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Antibiotic susceptibility in the surgical intensive care unit compared with the hospital-wide antibiogram.

作者信息

Kaufman D, Haas C E, Edinger R, Hollick G

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Rochester General Hospital, NY 14621-3095, USA.

出版信息

Arch Surg. 1998 Oct;133(10):1041-5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.133.10.1041.

DOI:10.1001/archsurg.133.10.1041
PMID:9790198
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial isolates from patients in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) with hospital-wide bacterial susceptibility.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort analytic study.

SETTING

Eight-bed SICU in a university-affiliated teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

All hospitalized patients with culture results positive for microorganisms.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Antibiotic susceptibility data were collected retrospectively for all bacterial isolates from SICU patients during July 1, 1994, to June 30, 1995. All duplicate and surveillance cultures were eliminated from the data set. Susceptibility testing was conducted using our standard laboratory methods. Results were compared with the hospital-wide antibiogram (HWA) for the same time period. Comparisons were made using the chi(2) test with Yates correction or the Fisher exact test, as appropriate. Staphylococcus aureus (HWA, n=494; SICU, n=71) was significantly less susceptible to oxacillin (51% vs 28%; P<.001), ciprofloxacin (50% vs 25%; P<.001), erythromycin (46% vs 23%; P<.001), and clindamycin (51% vs 27%; P<.001) in the SICU. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (HWA, n=339; SICU, n=37) were significantly less susceptible to oxacillin (33% vs 16%; P=.04) and clindamycin (57% vs 34%; P=.02). Pseudomonas aeruginosa (HWA, n=513; SICU, n=96) was less susceptible to imipenem (85% vs 74%, P=.01) and more susceptible to ticarcillin-clavulanic acid (88% vs 100%, P<.001) in the SICU. Escherichia coli (HWA, n=474; SICU, n=36) was more susceptible to most penicillin-derivative antibiotics in the SICU (ampicillin [68% vs 83%, P=.06], ticarcillin [65% vs 86%, P=.01], mezlocillin [76% vs 95%, P=.01], and ticarcillin-clavulanic acid [88% vs 100%, P=.02]).

CONCLUSIONS

The 2 most commonly isolated bacterial pathogens in the SICU (S aureus and P aeruginosa) had significantly different susceptibility patterns compared with the HWA. Surprisingly, E coli isolated in the SICU tended to be more susceptible to penicillin-derivative antibiotics. These data indicate that empiric antibiotic choices in the SICU may be better guided by unit-specific antibiograms.

摘要

相似文献

1
Antibiotic susceptibility in the surgical intensive care unit compared with the hospital-wide antibiogram.
Arch Surg. 1998 Oct;133(10):1041-5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.133.10.1041.
2
Antimicrobial susceptibilities of respiratory pathogens in the surgical/trauma intensive care unit compared with the hospital-wide respiratory antibiogram in a level I trauma center.一级创伤中心外科/创伤重症监护病房呼吸道病原体的抗菌药敏情况与全院呼吸道抗菌谱的比较
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2015 Feb;16(1):62-7. doi: 10.1089/sur.2013.171.
3
Implementation of antibiotic rotation protocol improves antibiotic susceptibility profile in a surgical intensive care unit.在外科重症监护病房实施抗生素轮换方案可改善抗生素敏感性情况。
J Trauma. 2007 Aug;63(2):307-11. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318120595e.
4
[Surveillance of resistance in the intensive care units using a cumulative antibiogram].[使用累积抗菌谱监测重症监护病房的耐药情况]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2018 Oct;52(4):329-339. doi: 10.5578/mb.67408.
5
In vitro activities of antibacterial agents against clinical isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella species from intensive care units.抗菌剂对重症监护病房临床分离的大肠杆菌和克雷伯菌属的体外活性。
Clin Ther. 1991 Jan-Feb;13(1):25-37.
6
Antibiotic-Impregnated Central Venous Catheters Do Not Change Antibiotic Resistance Patterns.抗生素浸渍中心静脉导管不会改变抗生素耐药模式。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2018 Jan;19(1):40-47. doi: 10.1089/sur.2017.087. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
7
MICROBIAL PROFILE AND ANTIBIOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY PATTERNS OF PATHOGENS CAUSING VENTILATOR- ASSOCIATED PNEUMONIA AT INTENSIVE CARE UNIT, SESTRE MILOSRDNICE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CENTER, ZAGREB, CROATIA.克罗地亚萨格勒布塞斯特雷米洛什尔尼察大学医院中心重症监护病房引起呼吸机相关性肺炎的病原菌的微生物谱及抗生素敏感性模式
Acta Clin Croat. 2015 Jun;54(2):127-35.
8
Comparison of Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing guidelines for the interpretation of antibiotic susceptibility at a University teaching hospital in Nairobi, Kenya: a cross-sectional study.肯尼亚内罗毕一所大学教学医院对临床实验室标准协会和欧洲抗菌药物敏感性试验委员会抗生素敏感性解读指南的比较:一项横断面研究。
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2016 Apr 11;15:21. doi: 10.1186/s12941-016-0135-3.
9
Bacteriologic profile and antibiogram of blood culture isolates from a children's hospital in Kabul.喀布尔一家儿童医院血培养分离株的细菌学特征及抗菌谱
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2014 Jun;24(6):396-399.
10
Antibiograms Cannot Be Used Interchangeably Between Acute Care Medical Centers and Affiliated Nursing Homes.急症护理医疗中心与附属医院的养老院之间不能混用抗生素药敏谱。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Jan;21(1):72-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.07.016. Epub 2019 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

1
An analysis of the value-added of antibiogram subgroup stratification.抗菌谱亚组分层的附加值分析。
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2025 Apr 5;24(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12941-025-00787-7.
2
Drug-resistant bacteria in the critically ill: patterns and mechanisms of resistance and potential remedies.危重症患者中的耐药菌:耐药模式、机制及潜在治疗方法
Front Antibiot. 2023 Jun 30;2:1145190. doi: 10.3389/frabi.2023.1145190. eCollection 2023.
3
Empirical antibiotic choice alters microbiological outcomes: Findings from comparative antibiograms in a trauma intensive care unit.
经验性抗生素选择会改变微生物学结果:创伤重症监护病房比较抗菌谱的研究结果
South Afr J Crit Care. 2020 Dec 1;36(2). doi: 10.7196/SAJCC.2020.v36i2.434. eCollection 2020.
4
The antibiogram: key considerations for its development and utilization.抗菌谱:其制定与应用的关键考量因素
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2021 May 25;3(2):dlab060. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlab060. eCollection 2021 Jun.
5
Considerations for Empiric Antimicrobial Therapy in Sepsis and Septic Shock in an Era of Antimicrobial Resistance.在抗生素耐药时代考虑脓毒症和脓毒性休克的经验性抗菌治疗。
J Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 21;222(Suppl 2):S119-S131. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa221.
6
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.拯救脓毒症运动:脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理国际指南:2016 年版。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Mar;43(3):304-377. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
7
Bacterial susceptibility patterns in patients with spinal cord injury and disorder (SCI/D): an opportunity for customized stewardship tools.脊髓损伤和疾病(SCI/D)患者的细菌药敏模式:定制管理工具的契机。
Spinal Cord. 2016 Nov;54(11):1001-1009. doi: 10.1038/sc.2016.38. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
8
Analysis and Presentation of Cumulative Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Data--The Influence of Different Parameters in a Routine Clinical Microbiology Laboratory.累积抗菌药物敏感性试验数据的分析与呈现——常规临床微生物实验室中不同参数的影响
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 27;11(1):e0147965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147965. eCollection 2016.
9
Cumulative Antimicrobial Susceptibility Data from Intensive Care Units at One Institution: Should Data Be Combined?来自一家机构重症监护病房的累积抗菌药物敏感性数据:数据应合并吗?
J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Apr;54(4):956-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02992-15. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
10
Antimicrobial susceptibilities of respiratory pathogens in the surgical/trauma intensive care unit compared with the hospital-wide respiratory antibiogram in a level I trauma center.一级创伤中心外科/创伤重症监护病房呼吸道病原体的抗菌药敏情况与全院呼吸道抗菌谱的比较
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2015 Feb;16(1):62-7. doi: 10.1089/sur.2013.171.