Hansen P A, Woolsey G, Killoy W J, Hanson C
Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Missouri at Kansas City, USA.
J Prosthet Dent. 1998 Oct;80(4):429-33. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70007-1.
Earlier studies on orthodontic brackets have shown a loss of bond strength after a sonic toothbrush was used.
This in vitro study evaluated the difference in bond strength of single complete veneer crowns after being subjected to the equivalent of 2 years of brushing with sonic and counterrotational toothbrushes.
Complete gold crowns were fabricated with a conventional indirect technique for 30 extracted, intact, prepared human premolar teeth. Castings were then luted to the teeth with glass ionomer cement. Teeth were randomly divided into 3 groups of 10 teeth each, 1 group to be brushed with Sonicare sonic toothbrush, 1 group to be brushed with Interplak counterrotational mechanical toothbrush, and 1 group as the control. Groups 1 and 2 were then brushed for the equivalent of 2 years per tooth. A uniform force of 50 g for the sonic toothbrush and 120 g for the counterrotational toothbrush was used. Control specimens were not brushed. Brush heads and sample teeth in contact with the toothbrush were kept moist at all times. Tensile dislodgment force was determined with an Instron universal testing machine.
The castings brushed with a sonic toothbrush required a mean of 43.22 kg (+/- 11.16) force to remove the crowns from the teeth, whereas the counterrotational group required a mean of 42.87 kg (+/- 10.42) and the control group a mean of 42.12 kg (+/- 6.61). Analysis of variance on the force data indicated no differences among the 3 groups in the force needed to remove the castings (F[2,24] = 0.031, P = .97).
This in vitro study demonstrated no significant differences between groups in the amount of tensile dislodgment force required to remove cemented full veneer crowns from prepared teeth after brushing for the equivalent of 2 years time with a sonic toothbrush or a counterrotational toothbrush.
早期关于正畸托槽的研究表明,使用声波牙刷后粘结强度会降低。
本体外研究评估了单颗全瓷贴面冠在使用声波牙刷和反向旋转牙刷进行相当于2年的刷牙后粘结强度的差异。
采用传统间接技术为30颗拔除的、完整的、已预备的人前磨牙制作全金冠。然后用玻璃离子水门汀将铸件粘结到牙齿上。牙齿被随机分为3组,每组10颗牙,1组用飞利浦声波牙刷刷牙,1组用Interplak反向旋转机械牙刷刷牙,1组作为对照组。然后第1组和第2组每颗牙刷牙相当于2年的时间。声波牙刷使用50 g的均匀力,反向旋转牙刷使用120 g的均匀力。对照样本不刷牙。始终保持与牙刷接触的刷头和样本牙齿湿润。用Instron万能试验机测定拉伸脱位力。
用声波牙刷刷牙的铸件从牙齿上移除冠平均需要43.22 kg(±11.16)的力,而反向旋转组平均需要42.87 kg(±10.42),对照组平均需要42.12 kg(±6.61)。对力数据的方差分析表明,在移除铸件所需的力方面三组之间没有差异(F[2,24] = 0.031,P = 0.97)。
本体外研究表明,用声波牙刷或反向旋转牙刷刷牙相当于2年时间后,从预备牙齿上移除粘结的全瓷贴面冠所需的拉伸脱位力在各组之间没有显著差异。