Bhasale A
Department of General Practice, University of Sidney, Australia.
Fam Pract. 1998 Aug;15(4):308-18. doi: 10.1093/fampra/15.4.308.
Although recognized by both patients and practitioners as a highly undesirable outcome, little is known about the factors which contribute to wrong diagnoses. Data collected through a pilot study of incident monitoring in general practice in Australia were examined to identify possible types of diagnostic incidents and their likely causes.
The aim was to identify how diagnostic incidents occur and to illuminate preventable and especially system causes of such incidents.
GP participants anonymously reported any event of potential harm to their patients, using both free text and structured-response categories. Free text was analysed qualitatively for common themes, while fixed format responses were used to provide an overall description of the data.
Diagnostic incidents occurred because of errors in judgement, particularly in the formation and evaluation of diagnostic hypotheses. Other problems related to systems of information transfer and medical records, and to poor communication between patients and health providers and between health professionals, which resulted in less than ideal care.
Incident monitoring is a useful tool for identifying sources of misdiagnosis and for implementation and assessment of quality improvement strategies.
尽管患者和从业者都认为错误诊断是极不理想的结果,但对于导致错误诊断的因素却知之甚少。对通过澳大利亚全科医疗事件监测试点研究收集的数据进行了检查,以确定诊断事件的可能类型及其可能原因。
旨在确定诊断事件是如何发生的,并阐明此类事件中可预防的原因,尤其是系统原因。
全科医生参与者使用自由文本和结构化反应类别,匿名报告对其患者有潜在危害的任何事件。对自由文本进行定性分析以找出共同主题,而固定格式的反应则用于提供数据的总体描述。
诊断事件的发生是由于判断错误,特别是在诊断假设的形成和评估方面。其他问题与信息传递和医疗记录系统有关,以及患者与医疗服务提供者之间以及医疗专业人员之间沟通不畅,从而导致护理不理想。
事件监测是识别误诊根源以及实施和评估质量改进策略的有用工具。