Suppr超能文献

成人哮喘患者口服泼尼松龙和雾化布地奈德的全身生物活性谱。

Systemic bioactivity profiles of oral prednisolone and nebulized budesonide in adult asthmatics.

作者信息

Wilson A M, McFarlane L C, Lipworth B J

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, University of Dundee, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

Chest. 1998 Oct;114(4):1022-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.114.4.1022.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Because nebulized budesonide may be used as an alternative to maintenance oral prednisolone in the treatment of severe chronic asthma, it is important to compare these two drugs to determine their relative systemic bioactivity profiles in terms of effects on adrenal, bone, and hematologic markers.

DESIGN

Twelve asthmatic patients (mean age; 34.7 years; mean FEV1; 88.3% predicted; mean forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of FVC, 54.8% predicted) were studied in a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized crossover design to compare placebo, low, medium, and high doses of nebulized budesonide given bid (1, 2, and 4 mg/d, respectively), and oral prednisolone given qd (5, 10, and 20 mg/d). All treatments and both placebos were given for 4 days at each dose level with a 7-day washout period between each treatment block with budesonide or prednisolone. All measurements were made at 8 AM after the last dose of each dose increment for plasma cortisol, serum osteocalcin, and blood eosinophil count.

RESULTS

Regression analysis showed significant dose-related suppression with prednisolone for 8 AM plasma cortisol (p<0.0001), osteocalcin (p<0.05), and blood eosinophil count (p<0.0005), but not with budesonide. Compared with placebo, there were significant differences only with prednisolone, at the medium- and high-dose levels for all three markers.

CONCLUSIONS

For all three systemic bioactivity markers (8 AM plasma cortisol, serum osteocalcin, and blood eosinophils), there was significant dose-related suppression with prednisolone but not with budesonide. Further long-term studies are required in more severe asthmatics in order to evaluate the therapeutic index.

摘要

研究目的

由于雾化布地奈德可作为维持性口服泼尼松龙治疗重度慢性哮喘的替代药物,比较这两种药物以确定它们在对肾上腺、骨骼和血液学指标影响方面的相对全身生物活性特征非常重要。

设计

采用双盲、双模拟、随机交叉设计对12例哮喘患者(平均年龄34.7岁;平均第一秒用力呼气容积[FEV1]为预测值的88.3%;用力肺活量[FVC]25%至75%之间的平均用力呼气流量为预测值的54.8%)进行研究,比较每日两次给予的安慰剂、低、中、高剂量雾化布地奈德(分别为1、2和4mg/d)以及每日一次给予的口服泼尼松龙(5、10和20mg/d)。所有治疗药物和两种安慰剂在每个剂量水平均给予4天,每个布地奈德或泼尼松龙治疗组之间有7天的洗脱期。在每次剂量增加的最后一剂用药后上午8点测量血浆皮质醇、血清骨钙素和血液嗜酸性粒细胞计数。

结果

回归分析显示,泼尼松龙对上午8点的血浆皮质醇(p<0.0001)、骨钙素(p<0.05)和血液嗜酸性粒细胞计数(p<0.0005)有显著的剂量相关抑制作用,而布地奈德无此作用。与安慰剂相比,仅泼尼松龙在中、高剂量水平对所有三个指标有显著差异。

结论

对于所有三个全身生物活性指标(上午8点血浆皮质醇、血清骨钙素和血液嗜酸性粒细胞),泼尼松龙有显著的剂量相关抑制作用,而布地奈德无此作用。需要对更重度哮喘患者进行进一步的长期研究以评估治疗指数。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验