Suppr超能文献

肌肉刺激装置产生的电磁干扰导致植入式心脏复律除颤器放电:比较心外膜双极和心内膜双极传感电路。

Electromagnetic interference from a muscle stimulation device causing discharge of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: epicardial bipolar and endocardial bipolar sensing circuits are compared.

作者信息

Glotzer T V, Gordon M, Sparta M, Radoslovich G, Zimmerman J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Hackensack University Medical Center, New Jersey 07601, USA.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998 Oct;21(10):1996-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb00021.x.

Abstract

This case report is about two patients with two different types of ICDs who underwent electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) therapy. In one patient with an ICD that has epicardial screw-in bipolar sensing leads, electromagnetic interference (EMI) from the EMS device caused the delivery of an inappropriate ICD discharge. In a second patient with an ICD with endocardial true bipolar sensing, there was no evidence of EMI during the EMS therapy despite all of our attempts to reproduce it. The sensing circuits in the two different ICDs are compared.

摘要

本病例报告涉及两名接受电肌肉刺激(EMS)治疗的患者,他们植入了两种不同类型的植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)。一名患者的ICD采用心外膜螺旋式双极感知导线,EMS设备产生的电磁干扰(EMI)导致ICD不适当放电。另一名患者的ICD采用心内膜真正双极感知,尽管我们尽了一切努力重现,但在EMS治疗期间未发现EMI迹象。对两种不同ICD的感知电路进行了比较。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验