• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Choosing between randomised and non-randomised studies: a systematic review.

作者信息

Britton A, McKee M, Black N, McPherson K, Sanderson C, Bain C

机构信息

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University of London, UK.

出版信息

Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(13):i-iv, 1-124.

PMID:9793791
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Choosing between randomised and non-randomised studies: a systematic review.随机对照研究与非随机对照研究的选择：一项系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(13):i-iv, 1-124.
2
To excel or to confirm? That is the question.是超越还是验证？这就是问题所在。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jun 1;77(7):944. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23206.
3
Validating the EXCEL hypothesis: a propensity score matched 3-year comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft in left main patients with SYNTAX score ≤32.验证 EXCEL 假说：SYNTAX 评分≤32 的左主干病变患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术的倾向评分匹配 3 年比较。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jun 1;77(7):936-43. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22992. Epub 2011 May 5.
4
The challenge of left main stenosis.左主干狭窄的挑战。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Jun;1(3):246-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.05.003.
5
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus bypass surgery for left main coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomised trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与旁路手术治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病：随机试验的荟萃分析。
EuroIntervention. 2011 Oct 30;7(6):738-46, 1. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7I6A117.
6
SYNTAX trial: analysis and clinical implications.SYNTAX 试验：分析与临床意义
Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2008 Oct-Dec;23(4):III-V.
7
Drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting for the treatment of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized studies.药物洗脱支架与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗冠状动脉疾病的比较：随机和非随机研究的荟萃分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 May;141(5):1134-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.07.001. Epub 2010 Dec 17.
8
Comparison of coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous drug-eluting stent implantation for treatment of left main coronary artery stenosis.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮药物洗脱支架植入术治疗左主干冠状动脉狭窄的比较
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Jun;1(3):236-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.02.007.
9
Ten-year outcome after coronary angioplasty in patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease and comparison with the results of the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS).单支冠状动脉疾病患者冠状动脉血管成形术后的十年预后及与冠状动脉外科研究（CASS）结果的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2000 Feb 1;85(3):321-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00740-7.
10
Preoperative risk models for minimally invasive coronary bypass: a preliminary study.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998 Oct;116(4):584-9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5223(98)70164-3.

引用本文的文献

1
[The application of real-world evidence in drug regulatory decision-making].[真实世界证据在药品监管决策中的应用]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2024 Feb;67(2):149-154. doi: 10.1007/s00103-023-03830-0. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
2
Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials: a meta-epidemiological study.采用观察性研究设计评估的医疗保健结果与采用随机试验评估的结果比较：一项meta 流行病学研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 4;1(1):MR000034. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000034.pub3.
3
Comparing the effects of a patient-designed-and-informed participant information leaflet in comparison with a standard, researcher-designed information leaflet on recruitment, retention and understanding: A study-within-a-trial.
比较患者设计并参与知情的参与信息手册与标准的、研究人员设计的信息手册对招募、留存率和理解的影响：一项试验中的研究。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2022 Jun 2;28:100936. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100936. eCollection 2022 Aug.
4
Arthroscopic hip surgery compared with personalised hip therapy in people over 16 years old with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: UK FASHIoN RCT.关节镜髋关节手术与个性化髋关节治疗在 16 岁以上股骨髋臼撞击综合征患者中的比较：英国 FASHIoN RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Feb;26(16):1-236. doi: 10.3310/FXII0508.
5
Bias estimation in study design: a meta-epidemiological analysis of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement.研究设计中的偏倚估计：经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术的荟萃流行病学分析。
BMC Surg. 2021 Jun 7;21(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01278-0.
6
Safety of intraoperative hypothermia for patients: meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials and observational studies.术中低温对患者的安全性：随机对照试验和观察性研究的荟萃分析。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Aug 15;20(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01065-z.
7
Heckman-type selection models to obtain unbiased estimates with missing measures outcome: theoretical considerations and an application to missing birth weight data.使用 Heckman 型选择模型获得具有缺失测量结果的无偏估计：理论考虑和对缺失出生体重数据的应用。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Dec 9;19(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0840-7.
8
Astym therapy improves FOTO outcomes for patients with musculoskeletal disorders: an observational study.激痛点针刺疗法改善肌肉骨骼疾病患者的FOTO结果：一项观察性研究。
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Oct;7(Suppl 7):S251. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.04.09.
9
Multi-institutional trial of non-operative management and surgery for uncomplicated appendicitis in children: Design and rationale.多机构合作研究儿童单纯性阑尾炎非手术治疗与手术治疗的比较：设计与原理。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 Aug;83:10-17. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.06.013. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
10
Anesthesia for endovascular treatment in anterior circulation stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.血管内治疗前循环卒中的麻醉：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Brain Behav. 2019 Jan;9(1):e01178. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1178. Epub 2018 Dec 3.