Suppr超能文献

乳腺介入手术

Interventional breast procedures.

作者信息

de Paredes E S, Langer T G, Cousins J

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Medical College of Virginia of Virginia Commonwealth University, USA.

出版信息

Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 1998 Sep-Oct;27(5):133-84. doi: 10.1016/s0363-0188(98)90010-x.

Abstract

The capability to provide histologic diagnoses of nonpalpable lesions by performance of percutaneous needle biopsy has revolutionized breast imaging in the past decade. The radiologist who performs percutaneous breast biopsies assumes an increased level of responsibility for the patient regarding patient selection, lesion selection, performance of the biopsy procedure, interpretation of results, and patient follow-up. With variable and increasingly numerous options for the biopsy of breast lesions, careful attention must be paid to the selection of patients and types of lesions for different procedures. Critical technical considerations affect whether biopsy of a lesion can be optimally performed percutaneously, and these considerations must be factored into the recommendations for patient treatment. In addition, a limited preprocedural clinical assessment of the patient will allow a safer procedure to be performed expeditiously. Most breast abnormalities classified by using the ACR Lexicon as 4 (suggestive) or 5 (highly suggestive, likely malignant) are suitable for either percutaneous breast needle biopsy or needle localization and excisional biopsy. In general, those lesions classified as 3 (probably benign) carry a recommendation for early follow-up and not biopsy, because the likelihood of malignancy is small. A particular advantage of percutaneous biopsy is in the diagnosis of multicentric breast cancer. Core biopsy is less invasive and less costly than surgical biopsy, and it can be used to demonstrate multicentric disease, saving the patient a two-step surgery. However, several lesions are better treated by excision than by percutaneous biopsy. Among these are architectural distortion or loosely arranged, segmental or regional microcalcifications. For nonpalpable breast lesions visualized on mammography, sonography, or both, imaging-guided localization is required for precise needle placement either for wire localization or for percutaneous breast biopsy. The selection of which modality to use for guidance depends on (1) the adequacy of visualization of the lesion by the modality used, (2) the position of the lesion, (3) the ease of positioning the patient, (4) the skill of the operator, (5) the need to reduce radiation exposure, (6) the overall patient condition, and (7) size of the lesion. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) has a high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of palpable breast lesions when the procedure is properly performed and interpreted. Variable results have been achieved with FNAB of nonpalpable breast lesions under imaging guidance. Three critical components are necessary to achieve reliable results by using FNAB. These include the following: (1) accuracy in needle placement, (2) skill in performance of FNAB, and (3) expert cytopathologic analysis. Accurate preoperative needle localization of nonpalpable breast lesions allows the radiologist to guide the surgeon performing an open biopsy and helps to ensure that the surgical procedure can be performed quickly and can be accomplished with the best possible cosmetic result for the patient. Lesions selected for needle localization and biopsy should undergo a complete tailored imaging evaluation before the needle localization is scheduled. Specimen radiography should be performed for all nonpalpable lesions. Once the lesion has been identified on specimen radiography, the radiologist can assist the pathologist in identifying the lesion microscopically by marking the lesion within the surgical specimen. We cover the technical and interpretative aspects of percutaneous breast biopsy and needle localization for surgical biopsy.

摘要

在过去十年中,经皮穿刺针吸活检用于对不可触及病变进行组织学诊断的能力彻底改变了乳腺影像学。进行经皮乳腺活检的放射科医生在患者选择、病变选择、活检操作的实施、结果解读以及患者随访等方面,对患者承担着更高的责任。随着乳腺病变活检的选择越来越多且各不相同,必须仔细考虑针对不同操作选择合适的患者和病变类型。关键的技术因素会影响能否通过经皮方式对病变进行最佳活检,这些因素必须纳入患者治疗建议中。此外,术前对患者进行有限的临床评估有助于迅速实施更安全的操作。大多数按照美国放射学会(ACR)词典分类为4类(可疑)或5类(高度可疑、可能为恶性)的乳腺异常情况,适合进行经皮乳腺针吸活检或针定位切除活检。一般来说,那些分类为3类(可能为良性)的病变建议进行早期随访而非活检,因为恶性可能性较小。经皮活检的一个特别优势在于对多中心性乳腺癌的诊断。粗针活检比手术活检侵入性小、成本低,并且可用于显示多中心疾病,为患者省去二次手术。然而,有些病变通过切除治疗比经皮活检更好。其中包括结构扭曲或排列松散的节段性或区域性微钙化。对于在乳腺X线摄影、超声检查或两者上显示的不可触及乳腺病变,无论是进行导丝定位还是经皮乳腺活检,都需要影像引导定位以精确放置针头。选择何种引导方式取决于以下因素:(1)所用方式对病变的显示程度;(2)病变位置;(3)患者体位摆放的难易程度;(4)操作者的技术水平;(5)减少辐射暴露的需求;(6)患者的整体状况;(7)病变大小。细针穿刺抽吸活检(FNAB)在正确实施和解读时,对可触及乳腺病变的诊断具有较高的敏感性和特异性。在影像引导下对不可触及乳腺病变进行FNAB的结果不一。要通过FNAB获得可靠结果,需要三个关键要素。这些要素包括:(1)针头放置的准确性;(2)FNAB操作的技术水平;(3)专业的细胞病理学分析。对不可触及乳腺病变进行准确的术前针定位,可使放射科医生指导外科医生进行开放活检,并有助于确保手术能够快速进行,且能为患者实现最佳的美容效果。在安排针定位之前,所选进行针定位和活检的病变应接受全面的针对性影像评估。应对所有不可触及病变进行标本射线照相。一旦在标本射线照相上识别出病变,放射科医生可通过在手术标本内标记病变,协助病理科医生在显微镜下识别病变。我们涵盖了经皮乳腺活检及用于手术活检的针定位的技术和解读方面。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验