• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳牙激光预处理釉质和牙本质对不同修复材料微渗漏的影响。

Effect of laser pretreated enamel and dentin of primary teeth on microleakage of different restorative materials.

作者信息

Salama F S

机构信息

College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1998 Summer;22(4):285-91.

PMID:9796497
Abstract

Surface texture of the prepared dental tissue is one of the most important factors affecting the clinical performance of dental restorations. This surface area is greatly affected by the surface treatment modality used and the restorative material applied. Therefore, the purpose of this in vitro investigation was to study the effect of laser pretreatment of enamel and dentin in Class V cavities of human primary molars on microleakage of three restorative materials; a compomer, a composite resin and a Galloy. Forty-eight extracted human primary molar teeth divided into 6 groups [3 control & 3 experimental] were used in this study. A standardized Class V cavity involving enamel and dentin was made in the buccal surface of each tooth and the experimental groups were exposed to Nd: YAG laser for 90 seconds. Teeth in all groups were then restored with the tested materials according to the instructions of the manufacturers. The teeth were prepared for microleakage testing and then immersed in 5% methylene blue for 4 hours. Each tooth was subsequently sectioned and examined for dye penetration along the occlusal and gingival walls. Tukey's multiple range test showed that combined microleakage scores of unlased Pertac II, was statistically significantly higher than lased Hytac, lased Pertac II, unlased Galloy and lased Galloy. Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test showed statistically significant difference for unlased Pertac II group [p = 0.0176] when occlusal Vs gingival scores were compared. In conclusion, microleakage of unlased Galloy restorations were statistically significantly better than unlased Hytac and Pertac II groups. In addition, microleakage scores of lased Pertac II group was statistically significantly lower than unlased group. No statistically significant differences were found between lased and unlased Hytac and Galloy restorative materials.

摘要

预备后的牙体组织表面纹理是影响牙齿修复体临床性能的最重要因素之一。该表面积受所采用的表面处理方式和所应用的修复材料的极大影响。因此,本体外研究的目的是研究对人类乳磨牙Ⅴ类洞的釉质和牙本质进行激光预处理对三种修复材料(一种复合体、一种复合树脂和一种银汞合金)微渗漏的影响。本研究使用了48颗拔除的人类乳磨牙,分为6组(3个对照组和3个实验组)。在每颗牙齿的颊面制备一个涉及釉质和牙本质的标准化Ⅴ类洞,实验组暴露于Nd:YAG激光下90秒。然后根据制造商的说明,用测试材料对所有组的牙齿进行修复。将牙齿制备用于微渗漏测试,然后浸入5%的亚甲蓝中4小时。随后将每颗牙齿切片,并检查染料沿咬合壁和牙龈壁的渗透情况。Tukey多重极差检验表明,未激光处理的Pertac II的联合微渗漏评分在统计学上显著高于激光处理的Hytac、激光处理的Pertac II、未激光处理的Galloy和激光处理的Galloy。Wilcoxon配对符号秩检验表明,当比较咬合面与牙龈面评分时,未激光处理的Pertac II组存在统计学显著差异[p = 0.0176]。总之,未激光处理的Galloy修复体的微渗漏在统计学上显著优于未激光处理的Hytac和Pertac II组。此外,激光处理的Pertac II组的微渗漏评分在统计学上显著低于未激光处理组。在激光处理和未激光处理的Hytac及Galloy修复材料之间未发现统计学显著差异。

相似文献

1
Effect of laser pretreated enamel and dentin of primary teeth on microleakage of different restorative materials.乳牙激光预处理釉质和牙本质对不同修复材料微渗漏的影响。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1998 Summer;22(4):285-91.
2
Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.各种聚合修复材料的微渗漏和聚合收缩
J Dent Child (Chic). 2008 May-Aug;75(2):125-33.
3
Microleakage of Class V restorations using two different compomer systems: an in vitro study.使用两种不同复合树脂粘结剂系统的Ⅴ类洞修复体微渗漏:一项体外研究
J Clin Dent. 1999;10(4):124-6.
4
Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.窝洞预备器械:对V类树脂基复合树脂修复体微渗漏的影响
Am J Dent. 2001 Jun;14(3):157-62.
5
The effect of different drying methods for single step adhesive systems on microleakage of tooth colored restorations.单步粘结系统的不同干燥方法对牙齿颜色修复体微渗漏的影响。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2003 Feb 15;4(1):1-9.
6
Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.可流动复合树脂、复合体和玻璃离子水门汀的牙本质粘结强度及微渗漏
Aust Dent J. 2008 Dec;53(4):325-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00074.x.
7
Microleakage of composite resin restorations in cervical cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser radiation.铒铬:钇-钪-镓石榴石激光辐射制备的颈部洞复合树脂修复体的微渗漏
Aust Dent J. 2008 Jun;53(2):172-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00028.x.
8
Influence of Erbium:YAG laser energies on the microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.铒钇铝石榴石激光能量对Ⅴ类树脂基复合树脂修复体微渗漏的影响。
Am J Dent. 2000 Oct;13(5):280-4.
9
Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents.复合树脂充填技术对两种自酸蚀牙本质粘结剂微渗漏的影响
Am J Dent. 2001 Jun;14(3):132-6.
10
Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.使用不同树脂水门汀和牙本质黏接剂黏固的陶瓷嵌体的微渗漏
J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Oct;102(4):235-41. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60161-X.

引用本文的文献

1
Histological evaluation of mouse tongue incisions after Er:YAG laser surgery with different pulse energies versus after conventional scalpel surgery.不同脉宽能量的铒激光与传统手术刀切割小鼠舌部后组织学评价。
Lasers Med Sci. 2023 Aug 12;38(1):181. doi: 10.1007/s10103-023-03852-9.
2
Fracture Resistance of Incisal Fragments Following Reattachment With Different Techniques in Simulated Crown Fractures.模拟冠折后采用不同技术重新附着时切端碎片的抗折性
J Lasers Med Sci. 2017 Fall;8(4):181-185. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2017.33. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
3
Comparison of Micro-Leakage from Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Restorations in Cavities Prepared by Er:YAG (Erbium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet) Laser and Conventional Method in Primary Teeth.
铒激光与传统方法制备乳牙窝洞后树脂改性玻璃离子修复体微渗漏的比较
J Lasers Med Sci. 2014 Fall;5(4):183-7.
4
Laser application in prevention of demineralization in orthodontic treatment.激光在正畸治疗中预防牙釉质脱矿的应用
J Lasers Med Sci. 2013 Summer;4(3):107-10.