• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Conservative versus surgical treatment of mallet finger: a pooled quantitative literature evaluation.

作者信息

Geyman J P, Fink K, Sullivan S D

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle 98105, USA.

出版信息

J Am Board Fam Pract. 1998 Sep-Oct;11(5):382-90. doi: 10.3122/15572625-11-5-382.

DOI:10.3122/15572625-11-5-382
PMID:9796768
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although common, mallet finger represents a spectrum of injuries for which there are many questions about the best form of treatment. A long-standing controversy continues as to strategies and techniques of treatment. This quantitative literature analysis is the first that makes use of an evidence-based evaluation process to pool across studies the outcomes of conservative versus surgical treatment of closed mallet finger injuries of both acute and chronic or recurrent types.

METHODS

Published articles in English were sought using multiple methods, including the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, reference review, and correspondence with selected experts. Both observational and randomized trials were included. Results were summarized in terms of 95 percent confidence intervals, and sensitivity analysis was performed for two other amounts of residual extensor lag.

RESULTS

Of the 41 reports retrieved, 26 met inclusion criteria, including 21 for initial acute treatment (1146 pooled digits) and 5 for chronic or recurrent treatment (148 pooled digits). Successful outcomes were found in about 77 percent of mallet fingers treated conservatively by splintage, including 480 patients who were observed for a 2-year period. Patient satisfaction with conservative treatment was found to be about 83 percent in 6 studies recording overall patient satisfaction (315 pooled patients). Successful outcomes of surgical treatment for acute mallet finger averaged about 85 percent in 3 studies (60 pooled digits) and about 73 percent in 5 studies of chronic or recurrent mallet finger.

CONCLUSIONS

Conservative treatment of at least 80 percent of mallet finger injuries is safe, effective, well accepted by patients, and cost efficient compared with surgical treatment. Multiple types of surgical procedures are available when surgery is indicated for a limited number of open or otherwise complex mallet finger injuries as well as for chronic or recurrent mallet finger.

摘要

相似文献

1
Conservative versus surgical treatment of mallet finger: a pooled quantitative literature evaluation.
J Am Board Fam Pract. 1998 Sep-Oct;11(5):382-90. doi: 10.3122/15572625-11-5-382.
2
Surgical and Nonsurgical Management of Mallet Finger: A Systematic Review.锤状指的手术与非手术治疗:一项系统评价
J Hand Surg Am. 2018 Feb;43(2):146-163.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
3
Outcomes of Splinting in Pediatric Mallet Finger.小儿锤状指夹板固定的效果
J Hand Surg Am. 2018 Nov;43(11):1041.e1-1041.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.03.037.
4
[Mallet finger: surgery versus splinting].[锤状指:手术与夹板固定]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2014;158:A6941.
5
Conservative treatment of mallet finger: A systematic review.锤状指的保守治疗:一项系统评价。
J Hand Ther. 2015 Jul-Sep;28(3):237-45; quiz 246. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2015.03.001. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
6
Splinting versus Percutaneous Pinning for the Treatment of Soft Tissue Mallet Finger: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2022 Dec;27(6):952-956. doi: 10.1142/S2424835522500886. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
7
Effects of health literacy on treatment outcome and satisfaction in patients with mallet finger injury.健康素养对锤状指损伤患者治疗效果及满意度的影响。
J Hand Ther. 2016 Oct-Dec;29(4):459-464. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
8
The Diagnosis and Management of Mallet Finger Injuries.锤状指损伤的诊断与处理
Hand (N Y). 2017 May;12(3):223-228. doi: 10.1177/1558944716642763. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
9
[Conservative treatment results of the acute and chronic mallet finger].[急性和慢性锤状指的保守治疗结果]
Unfallchirurg. 2005 Dec;108(12):1044, 1046-8. doi: 10.1007/s00113-005-0974-4.
10
Treatment options for mallet finger: a review.锤状指的治疗方法:综述。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Nov;126(5):1624-1629. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ef8ec8.

引用本文的文献

1
Reconstruction of Chronic Soft Tissue Mallet Fingers: Outcomes of Step-Plasty vs. Purse-String Suture.慢性软组织锤状指的重建:阶梯成形术与荷包缝合术的效果对比
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024 Aug 24;9(3):144. doi: 10.3390/jfmk9030144.
2
Quick and safe: why a k-wire-extension-block-fixation of a bony mallet finger is the favoured treatment.快速且安全:为何骨锤状指的克氏针延长块固定是首选治疗方法。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Mar;144(3):1437-1442. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05119-y. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
3
Effectiveness of Quickcast Versus Custom-Fabricated Thermoplastic Orthosis Immobilization for the Treatment of Mallet Fingers: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
快速铸造式热塑夹板与定制热塑夹板治疗锤状指的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验。
Hand (N Y). 2022 Nov;17(6):1090-1097. doi: 10.1177/1558944720988136. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
4
[Finger injuries in ball sports].[球类运动中的手指损伤]
Unfallchirurg. 2015 Jun;118(6):496-506. doi: 10.1007/s00113-014-2723-z.
5
It's Not "Just A Finger".这不仅仅是根手指。
J Athl Train. 2000 Apr;35(2):168-78.