• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护理教育规划:一项德尔菲研究。

Nursing education planning: a Delphi study.

作者信息

Mitchell M P

机构信息

Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center of West Virginia University, School of Nursing, Charleston Division, 25304-1299, USA.

出版信息

J Nurs Educ. 1998 Oct;37(7):305-7. doi: 10.3928/0148-4834-19981001-07.

DOI:10.3928/0148-4834-19981001-07
PMID:9796869
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the Delphi technique as a viable method for forecasting future events in nursing education by determining the degree of accuracy of previously predicted events and identifying the circumstances that delayed or accelerated occurrence of the predicted events. Data were collected by three rounds of questionnaires distributed to 33 administrative heads of all nursing education programs in a southeastern state. The use of simple statistics concluded the Delphi technique was a valid instrument in nursing education planning: 22 of 26 events occurred as predicted, resulting in an 84.6% accuracy rate; 24 of 25 events which had not occurred remained viable, resulting in a 96% accuracy rate; 98.1% of the original events had either occurred or were still viable to occur.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估德尔菲技术作为预测护理教育未来事件的一种可行方法,通过确定先前预测事件的准确程度,并识别延迟或加速预测事件发生的情况。通过向东南部一个州所有护理教育项目的33名行政负责人发放三轮问卷来收集数据。运用简单统计得出,德尔菲技术在护理教育规划中是一种有效的工具:26个事件中有22个如预测的那样发生了,准确率达84.6%;25个未发生的事件中有24个仍然可行,准确率达96%;98.1%的原始事件已经发生或仍然有可能发生。

相似文献

1
Nursing education planning: a Delphi study.护理教育规划:一项德尔菲研究。
J Nurs Educ. 1998 Oct;37(7):305-7. doi: 10.3928/0148-4834-19981001-07.
2
Emergency preparedness curriculum in nursing schools in the United States.美国护理学校的应急准备课程
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2005 Nov-Dec;26(6):334-9.
3
What is happening in pre-licensure RN clinical nursing education? Findings from the faculty and administrator survey on clinical nursing education.预执业注册护士临床护理教育中正在发生什么?关于临床护理教育的教师和管理人员调查结果。
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2006 Mar-Apr;27(2):108-9.
4
Using evidence in education and practice: more findings from the national survey on excellence in nursing education.在教育与实践中运用证据:全国卓越护理教育调查的更多发现
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2006 Jul-Aug;27(4):219-21.
5
How innovative are we? What is the nature of our innovation?我们的创新程度如何?我们创新的本质是什么?
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2007 Jan-Feb;28(1):51-3.
6
Policies and procedures of accreditation for programs in nursing education. Associate degree programs, baccalaureate and higher degree programs, diploma programs, practical nursing programs.护理教育项目的认证政策与程序。副学士学位项目、学士学位及更高学位项目、文凭项目、实用护理项目。
NLN Publ. 1976(14-1473):1-28.
7
Open curriculum--what and why.
Am J Nurs. 1974 Dec;74(12):2232-8.
8
The open curriculum in nursing education: Final Report of the NLN Open Curriculum Study.护理教育中的开放式课程:护理教育全国联盟开放式课程研究最终报告
NLN Publ. 1979(19-1799):1-465.
9
Ensuring cultural diversity among California nurses.确保加利福尼亚州护士群体的文化多样性。
J Nurs Educ. 2003 Jun;42(6):245-8. doi: 10.3928/0148-4834-20030601-06.
10
Characteristics of the psychiatric clinical nursing laboratory in the state of Arkansas.
J Nurs Educ. 1999 Nov;38(8):360-3. doi: 10.3928/0148-4834-19991101-07.

引用本文的文献

1
Community Priority Index: Utility, Applicability and Validation for Priority Setting in Community-Based Participatory Research.社区优先指数:基于社区的参与性研究中优先事项设定的效用、适用性与验证
J Public Health Res. 2015 Jul 20;4(2):443. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2015.443. eCollection 2015 Jul 16.
2
Community-based decision making and priority setting using the R software: the community priority index.使用R软件进行基于社区的决策和优先级设定:社区优先级指数
Comput Math Methods Med. 2015;2015:347501. doi: 10.1155/2015/347501. Epub 2015 Feb 26.