Nichols K, DePuey E G, Friedman M I, Rozanski A
Department of Medicine, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital, and Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York 10025, USA.
J Nucl Cardiol. 1998 Sep-Oct;5(5):484-90. doi: 10.1016/s1071-3581(98)90179-9.
Some single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) methods to detect percent myocardial wall thickening (%WT) assume a linear relationship to changes in maximum myocardial counts, predicated on myocardial walls never exceeding the SPECT camera's partial volume limit. Recent studies have challenged such assumptions, reporting that systolic count changes underestimate wall thickening as measured by echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging.
To test whether clinical data ever are observed to exceed the partial volume limit, we examined gated tomograms of 75 patients selected at random and of an additional 25 patients known to have hypertension with electrocardiographic evidence of left ventricular hypertrophy. Image transformations were performed such that for every cinematic frame, radial counts at every angle were automatically normalized to the same maximum count. If no patient's myocardium ever exceeded the partial volume limit, thickness quantified from transformed images would always be the same throughout the cardiac cycle and would just correspond to the camera's line spread function. Thickness was measured by Gaussian fitting of transformed myocardial counts in the epicardial direction only to exclude cavitary count contamination. % WT was computed from thickness differences from diastole to systole. % WT values were assessed from clinical data at lateral, inferior, septal, anterior, and apical territories. Resulting %WT distributions were tested against the null hypothesis of %WT = 0 by the Z-test. Although some distributions were not actually Gaussian, the maximum mean %WT was only +3% +/-5% for the septal wall, in agreement with an observer's impressions of no detectable wall thickening. Thus mean %WT values were trivial compared with expected physiologic normal values of 30% to 50%.
No convincing evidence was found of thickness above the partial volume limit in this large sample of 75 normotensive and 25 hypertensive patients. Therefore it is likely that relations between myocardial count increases and wall thickening are similar throughout the cardiac cycle, even in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy.
一些用于检测心肌壁增厚百分比(%WT)的单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)方法假定其与最大心肌计数的变化呈线性关系,前提是心肌壁从未超过SPECT相机的部分容积限制。最近的研究对这些假设提出了质疑,报告称收缩期计数变化低估了经超声心动图和磁共振成像测量的壁增厚情况。
为了测试临床数据是否曾被观察到超过部分容积限制,我们检查了75名随机选择的患者以及另外25名已知患有高血压且有左心室肥厚心电图证据的患者的门控断层图像。进行图像变换,使得对于每个电影帧,每个角度的径向计数自动归一化为相同的最大计数。如果没有患者的心肌曾超过部分容积限制,那么从变换后的图像中量化的厚度在整个心动周期中始终相同,并且仅对应于相机的线扩散函数。仅通过对心外膜方向上变换后的心肌计数进行高斯拟合来测量厚度,以排除心腔计数污染。%WT通过舒张期到收缩期的厚度差异计算得出。从临床数据评估外侧、下壁、间隔、前壁和心尖区域的%WT值。通过Z检验针对%WT = 0的零假设对所得的%WT分布进行检验。尽管一些分布实际上并非高斯分布,但间隔壁的最大平均%WT仅为 +3% ±5%,这与观察者对无可检测到的壁增厚的印象一致。因此,与预期的30%至50%的生理正常值相比,平均%WT值微不足道。
在这75名血压正常和25名高血压患者的大样本中,未发现令人信服的证据表明存在超过部分容积限制的厚度。因此,即使在左心室肥厚的患者中,心肌计数增加与壁增厚之间的关系在整个心动周期中可能也是相似的。